Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
社会 › 堕胎
8>8 Personal answerPro-choice, with regulations. 1-3 free abortions, depending on the situations, then at their cost after that (abstinence, contraceptions, and father-custody/adoption agencies exist). If a pregnancy is known, the father should be informed, and allowed to make a case for either a proper birth/cesarean or an in-vitro option. Childbirth is a mother’s choice. Parenthood involves both partners. |
经济 › 税
8>8 Personal answerYes, to a reasonable degree. Rich people aren’t some enemy to target, and shouldn’t be treated like one. Perhaps a new “rich” tax should be implemented and voted upon by both the rich/poor, to best decide how to utilize those new funds (subsidized housing, groceries, necessities, etc.) |
教育 › 大学学费
8>8 Personal answerEach province should have 2 main places of secondary-learning: a no-cost place with extremely basic amenities, and a privately funded location. The No-cost institute should get a percentage of the provincial budget, the amount voted upon by said provincial populace, and re-adjusted on a regular basis. |
国内政策 › 枪支管制
8>8 Personal answerEither there should be a regular mental check up for all firearm owners (legal or not, if possible. Monetary incentives to coerce unlawful to participate?), or a town armoury where all firearms can be stored/checked out? Alterations to this idea seem likely and beneficial. |
环境 › 环境规制
8>8 Personal answerIt should be decided on a per-business model, though I’m all for supporting greener businesses, alternative/renewable energies, and environmental preservation. |
社会 › Hate Speech
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 最低工资
8>8 Personal answerYes? No? Every town/city/province should do a study to find out how much it cost yearly to survive in that location, and base the minimum wage on the means, medians, and modes per location. |
医保 › 医疗保健私有化
8>8 Personal answerI’m currently satisfied with the current system, though I wouldn’t mind a hybridized or split system (one privatized, one publicly funded to see what works, what doesn’t.) |
教育 › Student Loan Debt
8>8 Personal answerEvery student in debt should have SOME opportunity to recoup some losses. If we can find enough in the budget for a lump sum, great. If not, students should still be able to contact someone and get some other kind of relief: receiving textbooks in high-demand fields, a set-time living somewhere rent-free, food/bills/amenities, some tuition relief for a career change. This would only apply to each student once, maybe twice depending on circumstances, to prevent another potential drain on funds by parasitic citizens or students with little-to-no drive or plans. |
移民 › 遣送移民罪犯出境
8>8 Personal answerYes, if they cannot serve their sentence/cannot be rehabilitated, so long as it’s safe to return to their country. No, so long as they can serve their sentence fully, or can be sufficiently rehabilitated. |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
8>8 Personal answer不应该,而是要激励消费者重复利用这些产品 |
国内政策 › 本地资金
8>8 Personal answerAll aboriginals, relatives, and all involved should meet, discuss a 1-time reparations fee, and implement either a lump sum or payment plan so as to do away with this issue, since it’s causing more harm and hatred then it’s causing good. |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › 毒品政策
8>8 Personal answerDrugs should be studied and legalized/restricted per province/country as they’ve been so far. There should also be a location with specialized rooms for harder drug use, staffed with security, medics, and people trained to help keep delusional people grounded, so long as the drug users pay some upkeep fee and sign a waiver stating they know the potential risks involved, along with a donation box for a related treatment centre. |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
总统大选 › 有犯罪前科的政客
8>8 Personal answerYes, if the crime they committed (or commit while campaigning/in-office) doesn’t seriously affect their judgment and decisions, and they try their best at maintaining their duties. |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
8>8 Personal answerYes/maybe, for local police. If citizens want a police force they can trust, they should also be the ones funding that police force. RCMP and crown/privatized security, no. RCMP I believe are loyal to the crown/government, and private security is usually just for profit. |
总统大选 › 最低投票年龄
8>8 Personal answerYes, so long as the voter has a decent understanding of each political party, knows which party they support/oppose, and know the ramifications of voting and not voting. |
Housing › Foreign Owned Homes
8>8 Personal answerNo, so long as they fully intend to reside there, or plan to live there permanently in the future. Yes, if they’re just trying to become a land owner for profit, or they plan to hand over the land to foreign powers. |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
8>8 Personal answerYes, if they have serious intent to permanently and legally reside in Canada. |
经济 › 政府支出
8>8 Personal answerYes, or No, if we get an unbiased individual/group (likely someone foreign to Canada, along with a learned private citizen and a government official) to investigate the leading cause of the national debt, along with who’s a bigger influence - private citizens or government bureaucracies/policies. |
Housing › Affordable Housing
8>8 Personal answerYes, but we should TRY to keep farmland and green space. We should see if any contractors/corporations would be willing to rebuild/repair existing houses (maybe at cost), or if people would volunteer their efforts/manpower towards this endeavour as well, in their local communities. |
Housing › Home Buyer Incentives
8>8 Personal answerYes, though if a homeowner starts to see significant profits after paying off their mortgage, there should be an office in the government that they can make donations to as thanks for the support, or that they can vote to receive a portion from tax/treasury for future homeowner subsidies. |
教育 › 中学后教育
8>8 Personal answerI feel provinces should try out a two-institution model: A zero-cost institution of volunteers/fresh instructors, paid-by-provincial-taxes and a privatized institution, so each province can see which model works better for them. |
外交政策 › 法案C-51
8>8 Personal answerYes, if local police and intelligence agencies are fully committed to protecting the Canadian populace over the Crown/privatized factions. If police can be strong armed by higher-ups or sponsors, or if they can be bought out, then they can become a liability to the people they were previously sworn to protect. |
交通运输 › 公共交通
8>8 Personal answerYes, if the government spends more than 50% of their travel time using public transportation. No, if they use mostly (their own) vehicle/s. |
外交政策 › 外国援助
8>8 Personal answerWe should lower this budget, at first, until we can eliminate certain unnecessary plagues over our home soil. Once poverty, (non-parasitical) homelessness, racial/unprovoked hostility is lowered or non-existent, more funds can be distributed to foreign aid. |
交通运输 › Green Transportation
8>8 Personal answerYes, if it’s economically and ecologically viable, with encouragement towards making greener/more-profitable advancements and alternatives/alterations. No, if we’re unprepared to meet the requirements of an all-electric public transport model. |
外交政策 › 军费支出
8>8 Personal answerI’m neutral on this one, but I’m all for increasing it if it directly benefits our troops/forces and overseas missions/assets, so long as those contributing (tax payers) can get a rough list of purchases, and certain civilians can get a more in-depth look at Canadian military efforts (current standard issues, mission goals, tech demonstrations, etc.) |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. 这一主题只是对你最重要的。
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.