Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
医保 › 精神健康
8>8 Personal answerYes, we should have options open/standards for provinces to accept this as a necessary service to include as part of their plan. |
医保 › Mental Health Funding
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
社会 › Gender Transition
8>8 Personal answer不 |
医保 › 医疗护理资金
8>8 Personal answerYes, wherever necessary as the COVID-19 pandemic has shown that our medical systems could be better than they are right now/as well as being able to take care of older generations when they retire. But, provinces should also be pulling their own weight, as many have cut healthcare during the pandemic, leaving many more vulnerable. |
社会 › Hate Speech
8>8 Personal answerNo, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government |
环境 › Local Environmental Guidelines
8>8 Personal answerYes, we should follow the goals of the Paris Agreement and take the necessary steps, however we must also look at practical solutions that work for our communities/economy, and work to be the one of the global leaders in environmentalism. |
环境 › 日志记录
8>8 Personal answerThere are plenty of forests that are managed by forestry companies. However, we should also preserve a lot of our old growth forests as well/and other public lands to drastically reduce CO2 emissions. |
医保 › Vaccine Mandates for Customers
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
移民 › 移民同化
8>8 Personal answerYes, it helps. But we should also embrace all of the different languages and culture that immigrants bring to our country. |
环境 › Animal Testing
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
8>8 Personal answer是的,社交媒体上有太多的假新闻和误报 |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
8>8 Personal answer不,根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的 |
罪行 › 运输毒品罪处以的刑罚
8>8 Personal answerNo, I don't trust the government to decide use of capital punishment. There's simply too many things that could go wrong, especially considering that many death row inmates are actually innocent/potentially falsely convicted. Life in prison instead, and let's decriminalize drugs/even potentially legalize them like Portugal so that nobody dies from tainted drugs in the first place. |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
8>8 Personal answer不 |
医保 › 安全港
8>8 Personal answer应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。 |
环境 › Freshwater Research
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 工会
8>8 Personal answerI would say unions have a mix of both. It can make it incredibly hard for business to do some things, and lead to tensions between management/workers. But, while there are these flaws, unions can negotiate for great things, such as better pay, hours, benefits, and other things which help ease the burden on our governments/and help people become less dependent on the government. |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
8>8 Personal answerI'm neutral on this. There should be training for police officers so that they feel that they can adequately deal with a situation, even funding for mental health professionals that go on duty with them. But, if social and community based programs show that they do work, we should by all means consider funding them as a way to reduce recidivism. Let's not cut anything first, and let's talk and give adequate consultation to both police departments and community organizations, and then make our decisions based off of that. |
罪行 › 假释听证会
8>8 Personal answer是的提供严格的心理评价表明他们不再是对社会的威胁 |
Housing › Foreign Owned Homes
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
总统大选 › Political Party Subsidies
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
8>8 Personal answerYes, and create more social programs to provide free food, clothing, and medicine |
Housing › Affordable Housing
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › Ukraine and Nato
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only if they want to. NATO should have an open-door policy to be able to accept them, which they do, but they should not be threatened into doing so/saying no by powers such as Russia. |
Housing › Non-Resident Real Tax
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
总统大选 › 选举制度改革
8>8 Personal answerNo, this could make our government's ability of good governance/efficiency to be compromised, as the government is made up of a broad coalition of different views. I get why people think this is a good idea, as it could preserve a lot of really good ideas that in a FPTP system could be at more risk of being fully eliminated/scratched from budgets, but it could make people lose faith in an already good system that works, and that's why I'm against it. I would prefer a system such as ranked balloting, in which individual people rank their preference in terms of candidates, because most people, when going to the polls, have an idea of at least two or three people they're going to vote for/allows candidates to win based on broad support, rather than pandering to their voter base only. |
医保 › World Health Organization
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute |
交通运输 › Green Transportation
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
8>8 Personal answerOnly if there is evidence that shows that they are actively interfering with the markets, and making it hard for others to compete. There are other ways that you can reduce the influence, such as banning false content, hate speech, etc. |
国内政策 › CBC Funding
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
8>8 Personal answer不 |
教育 › Charter Schools
8>8 Personal answerNo, we should focus on improving our public schools and increasing teacher wages instead |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
8>8 Personal answerCities should be allowed to offer economic incentives for businesses to relocate, however it should also focus on improving the community, and infrastructure within to make it more desirable for people to live. It should also have high standards, such as environmental protections/and other regulations so that businesses can't get away with cutting costs at the expense of the environment/other issues. |
外交政策 › Venezuela Sanctions
8>8 Personal answer不 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. 这一主题只是对你最重要的。
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 16 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.