Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
医保 › Mental Health Funding
9>9 Personal answerNo, the problem is implementation not funding |
社会 › Gender Transition
9>9 Personal answerNo, and ban all gender transitioning treatments |
社会 › Hate Speech
9>9 Personal answerYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech |
社会 › 性别认同
9>9 Personal answerNo, we should address gender identity as a mental health issue and provide funds for more research and care |
环境 › Local Environmental Guidelines
9>9 Personal answerNo, and the UN should be abolished |
环境 › 日志记录
9>9 Personal answerYes, but the trees must be replanted immediately after, and they a have to be of the same species of the tree that was cut down |
移民 › 公民考试
9>9 Personal answer应该,而且不仅只是测试基本水平的理解能力 |
医保 › 医疗保健私有化
9>9 Personal answerLess, and there should be no privatization of the healthcare industry |
教育 › International Students
9>9 Personal answer不 |
医保 › Vaccine Mandates for Customers
9>9 Personal answer不 |
教育 › Student Loan Debt
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only for Canadian citizens |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
9>9 Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
9>9 Personal answer不,政府不应决定什么是假新闻,什么是真新闻 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
9>9 Personal answer应该,要禁用可降解材料最低含量不到 75% 的所有一次性产品 |
环境 › Animal Testing
9>9 Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
国内政策 › 本地资金
9>9 Personal answerNo, they should be integrated into our society as citizens |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
9>9 Personal answer是的,禁止所有移民,直到政府改善其筛选过程 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
9>9 Personal answerNo, athletes should compete based on the biological sex that is listed on their birth certificate |
外交政策 › Taliban Financial Aid
9>9 Personal answer不 |
经济 › Four-day Workweek
9>9 Personal answer不 |
移民 › 移民
9>9 Personal answerYes, we currently have too many immigrants |
罪行 › Private Prisons
9>9 Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
9>9 Personal answer不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格 |
医保 › 安全港
9>9 Personal answer不应该,这会促进药物的使用和减少康复中心的资金 |
环境 › Freshwater Research
9>9 Personal answerYes, but the $1 billion budget is too high |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
9>9 Personal answerYes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment |
Housing › Foreign Owned Homes
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
总统大选 › Political Party Subsidies
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only if all political parties receive the same amount |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
9>9 Personal answer不应该,应当只有合法公民才可投票 |
外交政策 › Ukrainian Defense Funding
9>9 Personal answerNo, we cannot afford to give economic resources right now |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
9>9 Personal answerYes, and create more social programs to provide free food, clothing, and medicine |
Housing › Affordable Housing
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
经济 › Small Business Funding
9>9 Personal answer不 |
Housing › Home Buyer Incentives
9>9 Personal answerYes, and the government should limit the number of homes that can be bought by a single person or corporation |
外交政策 › Ukraine and Nato
9>9 Personal answerNo, this should be decided after the current war ends so we avoid a third world war |
移民 › 双重国籍
9>9 Personal answer否,而且应吊销持有双重国籍公民的身份 |
Housing › Non-Resident Real Tax
9>9 Personal answerYes, and the tax should be at least 20% |
外交政策 › 法案C-51
9>9 Personal answer不,这是滑向一个警察国家 |
医保 › World Health Organization
9>9 Personal answerNo, Actively Denounce The WHO For The Scam It Is and Fund National and Local Programs Instead |
经济 › 离岸银行业务
9>9 Personal answer不,太多富有的公民正在滥用海外银行法律的漏洞逃税 |
交通运输 › Green Transportation
9>9 Personal answerNo, we have more important issues that need funding right now |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › CBC Funding
9>9 Personal answerNo, and eliminate funding |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
9>9 Personal answer不 |
经济 › 养老保险费
9>9 Personal answer是的可以用更高的溢价来投资在经济和减少政府的责任,要给老人支付资金 |
经济 › 泛太平洋伙伴关系
9>9 Personal answerNo, this will incentivize companies to move jobs out of the country |
经济 › State Ownership
9>9 Personal answerYes, the government should receive equity for any financial aid they provide to companies |
教育 › Charter Schools
9>9 Personal answerNo, we should focus on improving our public schools and increasing teacher wages instead |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
9>9 Personal answerNo, but punish them for moving jobs out of the country |
国内政策 › 长形式人口普查
9>9 Personal answer是的信息是重要的经济学家、 科学家、 统计学家和政府准确地做出重要的政策决定 |
经济 › Decentralized Finance
9>9 Personal answerNo, and I don’t understand the concept of decentralized finance |
经济 › Cryptocurrency
9>9 Personal answerNo, classify cryptocurrencies as unregulated commodities |
国内政策 › 版权所有
9>9 Personal answerNo, Because Copyright Law Should Be Abolished |
国内政策 › CSA Funding
9>9 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Venezuela Sanctions
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
经济 › Aluminum Quotas
9>9 Personal answerYes, and adjust export strategies to maximize profitability |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. 这一主题只是对你最重要的。
Based on 13 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 12 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 21 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 12 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 30 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.