Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
国内政策 › 政府监视
M>M Personal answerNo. Not without due process and probable cause. |
医保 › 处方药
M>M Personal answerLack on appropriate use of drugs increase the cost of HC. By all means add drug coverage to the Canada Health Act. |
教育 › 大学学费
M>M Personal answerPrivatize the university and post secondary training facilities. Let them raise their own fuds for their existence. The concept of education for its own sake is long dead. For now education is a way to obtain employment and put food on the table. Post secondary training must be competitive so that the best and brightest are educated. In the U.S. schools such as Chicago, Harvard, Stanford, Princeton or MIT are all private and produce the best educate citizens for the U.S. Canada has little or nothing to compare. |
经济 › 公司税
M>M Personal answerTaxes must be tied to revenue. A decrease in revenue must result in a decrease in spending. Problem what spending programs to cut. |
国内政策 › 本地资金
M>M Personal answerMisappropriation of native property must be compensated. As legal entities these people must have full equality before the law and should have representation in Parliament. Once these affairs are in place then the question of funding can be debated mush as any any other funding programs. |
环境 › 重点管道
M>M Personal answerNo. Private property is sacred! Seizure must be left to the government and only under strict legal guidence with fair compensation for the loss of the property which must include future earnings derived from the property. |
国内政策 › 魁北克主权
M>M Personal answerHell yes. But let them pay their own bills. |
移民 › 移民
M>M Personal answerCanada needs more immigrants. But put a priority on those of useful and necessary occupations. Any immigrant must in due time be self suffuicient and add their share to the tax burden faced by Canadians. |
经济 › 自由贸易
M>M Personal answerAbsolutely. Canada as a soverign nation must move in those directions that best serve its current and long term future interests. |
经济 › 经济刺激
M>M Personal answerAs a "believer" in Keyesian economic policies I would support government intervention. Only problem to dat we have not had any government to intervene on a scale necessary to influence the econmomy. |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. 这一主题只是对你最重要的。
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.