Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
医保 › COVID Mask Mandate
Personal answer不 |
社会 › 堕胎
Personal answerPro-Life, Life beginning at the uterine wall when cell growth starts. So (Plan B) the morning after pill is ideal for promoting. The Government should not fund any abortion or activism (of any kind). |
国内政策 › 政府监视
Personal answerNo, and all Espionage (CSIS, CSE, et al...) should be banned. |
医保 › 处方药
Personal answerNo, Should not be a federal matter. |
社会 › LGBT收养权
Personal answerYes, if there is shown to be a solid extended family with good opposite sex active role models. |
外交政策 › 义务兵役
Personal answer1 year health screening and training, to see if they like it. No combat or tours. |
经济 › 税
Personal answerNo, we need to eliminate all taxes on Individuals. Keep tariffs on foreign goods, and a royalty to sales of Goods, Services, Franchise Fees, and Stock Sales by non-Sole Owned Companies. |
国内政策 › 枪支管制
Personal answerNo, it should be fully legal, like Constitution Carry and Castle Doctrine (right to personal security). If your convicted or conditional release such rights don't apply. |
环境 › 环境规制
Personal answerNo, Provinces and Regions, Even Municipalities, would be best dealing with this issue. Different places, different problems. |
社会 › Gender Transition
Personal answerNo, surgery, hormones or puberty blocker. If you let your kid boy wear a dress or something and identify, fine. All have a right to mature naturally. |
医保 › 医疗护理资金
Personal answerNo, it isn't/should be a Federal Concern. |
社会 › Hate Speech
Personal answer是的 |
社会 › 安乐死
Personal answerNot assisted, if they want to do it themselves, up to them. Leave some cleanup money behind. |
环境 › Local Environmental Guidelines
Personal answer不 |
医保 › 牙齿保险
Personal answerNo, it should be a provincial matter. |
环境 › 日志记录
Personal answerDecentralize. It should be decentralized to the communities that rely on these industries to manage. People who know the area, needs. Most especially private property owners. |
经济 › 公司税
Personal answerRestructure Revenue Sourcing, we need to eliminate all taxes on Individuals. Keep tariffs on foreign goods, and a royalty to sales of Goods, Services, Franchise Fees, and Stock Sales by non-Sole Owned Companies. Even look at crowd funding on a voluntary level. |
社会 › 女性在战斗中
Personal answerNo, it's dishonorable to hide behind a woman. |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
Personal answer不,政府不应决定什么是假新闻,什么是真新闻 |
环境 › Animal Testing
Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
国内政策 › 本地资金
Personal answerNo, but individual natives should be offered owning a crowned land homestead that they will end up owning for their own use, rent, leasing out or resale if they so-choose. |
环境 › 水力压裂法
Personal answerYes, but the say should be the communities effected by the industries. |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
Personal answerThe Government shouldn't fund sports events. Private Leagues, Player Associations and Sports organizations should be allowed to set their own rules and contracts in this manner. Individual Sportsmen/women as well. |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
Personal answer不,但是我们应该禁止从“高危”国家移民。 |
环境 › 再生能源
Personal answerNo, the Government shouldn't fund any energy source, it should not take sides. |
环境 › 北方网关管道
Personal answerNo, concerns about property easements and Government funding of such projects make it impossible to support. |
国内政策 › 毒品政策
Personal answerAll Federal Laws On Drugs as well as Regulations should be ended unless pertaining to Trade. |
移民 › 移民
Personal answerMaybe more efficient would be what I'd want instead. Perhaps a limit of cases before it freezes and when dealt with start up again. Tougher on Illegals and Birth Tourists perhaps. End passports with friendly countries. |
罪行 › Private Prisons
Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
Personal answer不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性 |
国内政策 › 举报人保护
Personal answerGive them "Time Served," under a No Recrimination Act, as long as information proves true and leads to convictions. Anyone falsely accused has rights.. Don't treat them like heroes, unless they had nothing to do with what they witnessed. |
医保 › 安全港
Personal answerNo, it's a dangerous mixed message and highly controlling. |
经济 › 社会福利
Personal answerIt's a provincial issue. On principle, maybe there should be a limitation on the amount of years, perhaps an end to future generations and immigrants using it. Also separating Disability to the Medical System, not conflating it with welfare. |
经济 › 工会
Personal answerCentrally controlled monopolistic unions have hurt. Old fashioned guilds with apprenticeships and a contracted minimum, but not maximum wage should be fine. Civil Service unions do hurt things. |
医保 › 大麻
Personal answerI believe in ending all federal drug laws not related to trade. |
经济 › 自由贸易
Personal answerYes, 1 country at a time, only ones with relatively comparable values regarding individual liberties. |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
Personal answer不 |
总统大选 › 有犯罪前科的政客
Personal answerYes, if they did their full time. Not if paroled or conditionally released. |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
Personal answerNo, the Federal Government shouldn't fund any of it. Personally: Eliminate the Patrol, Beat, Vice, and Car 87/Wellness Check cops. |
外交政策 › Israel Boycott
Personal answer不 |
环境 › 转基因食品
Personal answerYes, fully labelled like advertising and in controlled growing so there is no accidental cross breading on the lands of others. |
总统大选 › 最低投票年龄
Personal answerNo, I am starting to side with raising it. |
罪行 › 假释听证会
Personal answerNo, and people who commit pattern serial murderers, predatory sex with minors and rape should never leave jail, even during burial. |
总统大选 › 总理任期限制
Personal answerNo, the province should set term limits to consecutive terms of their own MPs. |
总统大选 › Political Party Subsidies
Personal answer不 |
总统大选 › 竞选经费
Personal answerNo, as long as they can vote for the Candidate. |
经济 › 养老金
Personal answerLink to inflation/deflation, find a way to decentralize it to provinces. |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
Personal answer不应该,应当只有合法公民才可投票 |
经济 › 经济刺激
Personal answerNo, the Government should just get out of the way of the private sector. In most cases. |
移民 › 技术移民
Personal answerMaintain, unless there is a huge need for specific jobs to be filled. |
国内政策 › 工人罢工
Personal answerNo, and if it's non-essential, end it. |
经济 › 政府支出
Personal answerYes, most of Federal Government spending is for Civil Servants to redistribute funds to other high level civil servants, trickling it down to nothing and using strings attached to control local and provincial Government affairs. |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
Personal answerNo, unless they are a sitting incumbent. |
科学 › 核能
Personal answerYes, but the communities involved should have final say. |
经济 › 北美自由贸易协议(NAFTA)
Personal answerNo, we should have agreements one country at a time, with Sunshine Clauses, and only with countries with similar values on Liberty. |
经济 › 国内工作
Personal answerRestructure Revenue Sourcing, we need to eliminate all taxes on Individuals. Keep tariffs on foreign goods, and a royalty to sales of Goods, Services, Franchise Fees, and Stock Sales by non-Sole Owned Companies. Even look at crowd funding on a voluntary level.` |
Housing › Home Buyer Incentives
Personal answerNo, let them rent and save. |
Housing › Non-Resident Real Tax
Personal answerNo, not if they are citizens living in the Country. |
移民 › 双重国籍
Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 奖金上限
Personal answerNo, but no one should bail them out or offer corporate welfare to make it easy to help pay them more. |
总统大选 › 选举制度改革
Personal answerNo, open to a Ranked ballot system, where you get a score for the place on the voter's ballot. 1st = 10 pts, 2ns = 8 pts 3rd = 6 pts 4th = 4th pts 5th = 2pts and 6th = 1pt |
医保 › World Health Organization
Personal answer不 |
经济 › 离岸银行业务
Personal answerOnly in freer part of the world. Not communist or fascist states. |
经济 › 分裂的收入
Personal answerNo, I support a change to the tax system and code which would render individuals and families untaxed. The Corporate Royalty. |
罪行 › 罪犯投票权
Personal answerYes, unless they didn't finish their full term in prison but through Conditional and Parole release. |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
Personal answerOnly Google has the problem of running a search and platform, the rest do not. |
国内政策 › 参议院
Personal answerThe Senate should be composed of 2 seats per Province/Terr. and be appointed by their legislatures by an open-to-all ballot for them to choose from. |
国内政策 › CBC Funding
Personal answerNo, end the whole Heritage Ministry (CBC, CRTC) and Laws attached. |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › 军费支出
Personal answerDecrease, end all foreign military activity abroad. |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
Personal answerYes, pardon non-violent criminals for those crimes alone fully (not if they have others attached that are violent). |
教育 › Charter Schools
Personal answerYes, School Choice, vouchers, let the money follow the kid. |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
Personal answerNo, the government should never subsidize private businesses |
国内政策 › 长形式人口普查
Personal answerNo, Census should just be enumerating citizens for deciding how many MP Constituencies are needed. |
国内政策 › CSA Funding
Personal answer不 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. 这一主题只是对你最重要的。
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 12 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 19 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 21 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.