Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
外交政策 › 义务兵役
J>J Personal answerYes, at least one year, with "permission" for them to continue longer, with a focus on not only education and skill development but also on survival and defensive skills, all of which will lead to psychologically stronger young adults that will be better assets to Canada's society... and growth. |
教育 › 大学学费
J>J Personal answerIF we truly want a highly educated workforce to meet future development needs, then we must do as some other countries have already done... education must be free for all, from kindergarten to university, at least a 3-year program. |
医保 › 医疗护理资金
J>J Personal answerNo, but initiate an in-depth review, with the provinces, on ways and means to cut costs, with emphasis on non-traditional solutions, such as that proposed at villas3wave.starlight.ca/intro-e.htm |
经济 › 公司税
J>J Personal answerKeep current rates, subject to review, but review need to reduce deductions and/or loop holes and/or tax credits, BUT increase tax on shareholder dividends to eliminate the current trend of short-term gain at the expense of long-term growth. |
环境 › 重点管道
J>J Personal answerYes, as the pipeline if necessary for our future energy "independence", BUT the NEB MUST be revamped to ensure it does monitor and punish, with extreme prejudice, all companies to ensure compliance with the highest standards for public safety and environmental protection. |
社会 › 蒙面罩袍
J>J Personal answerIf by civic ceremony the intent is on situations where security is required, then their identity must be privately verified by multiple female staff members. |
环境 › 再生能源
J>J Personal answerNO, but should find ways to "encourage" (tax cuts, penalties, etc.) related companies/organizations to pursue such initiatives and/or research. |
环境 › 北方网关管道
J>J Personal answerNo, not until all the Aboriginal bands this project affects agree to it, AND the NEB has been revamped as mentioned above. |
移民 › 移民
J>J Personal answerYes, strictly screen immigrants for criminal AND terrorist related backgrounds |
国内政策 › 通勤火车
J>J Personal answerTransportation services should be monitored by government oversight, whether owned/managed by public or private entities. BUT new offerings should be encouraged. |
经济 › 养老保险税
J>J Personal answerNO, unless their total "revenues" surpass a "minimal living" amount based on cost of living, GDP and/or other criteria, to be determined. |
总统大选 › 竞选经费
J>J Personal answerYes, BUT with modified, and enforceable, criteria as to amounts donated to ensure that no one special interest group gets an advantage. |
经济 › 自由贸易
J>J Personal answerOf course, we are a global village, BUT only if strong protections for our national resources and workers are enacted with each trade deal AND only with nations that adhere to strict human rights policies, AND only if done transparently and with the support of Parliament and the public. |
国内政策 › 能源部门
J>J Personal answerEither venue is ok, BUT environmental and regulatory oversight, and enforcement/punishment, should be much improved. |
外交政策 › 法案C-51
J>J Personal answer不是,比尔是空泛的范围、 监督和问责制的问题 |
外交政策 › 外国援助
J>J Personal answerKeep at current levels until we, government and public, can review criteria and available budget. |
经济 › 就业保险
J>J Personal answerSeasonal jobs are a fact of life, and part of an evolving society's needs, and as such should be considered as worthy as non-seasonal jobs and should therefore qualify for employment insurance. |
移民 › 外国临时工
J>J Personal answerLet the market "advise" the government as to needs, BUT have the government ensure that their needs are not damaging to citizens' opportunities to find suitable work. |
交通运输 › 商业无人机
J>J Personal answerYes, and create standards for their use, but let the market determine services, models, etc. |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. 这一主题只是对你最重要的。
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.