Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
医保 › COVID Mask Mandate
Personal answerYes, but only indoors or crowded areas |
医保 › 精神健康
Personal answer应该,我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务 |
医保 › Mental Health Funding
Personal answerYes, and increase funding for research into the causes of mental illness |
社会 › Gender Transition
Personal answer是的 |
社会 › 安乐死
Personal answer是,但必须经过心理测试,确定他们完全理解这种选择的后果才可以 |
社会 › Hate Speech
Personal answerYes, as long as it does not threaten violence |
环境 › Local Environmental Guidelines
Personal answerYes, and exceed the guidelines and be the world leader in environmental standards |
移民 › 公民考试
Personal answer是,但只限于非常基础和简单的话题 |
经济 › 公司税
Personal answerIncrease rates and eliminate deductions and loop holes |
医保 › 医疗保健私有化
Personal answerLess, and there should be no privatization of the healthcare industry |
教育 › International Students
Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › 外国选举
Personal answerNo, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy |
医保 › Vaccine Mandates for Customers
Personal answer是的 |
教育 › Student Loan Debt
Personal answerYes, and forgive all student load debt |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
Personal answerNo, I think businesses should require vaccination but not by government mandate |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
Personal answerYes, but not until making environmentally-friendly alternatives that exist at the same (or lower) price, and use government regulation or intervention to get companies to that right now. Until then, this just seems to discriminate against people like those with disabilities and working class people who can't afford to or don't have the time or energy to wash dishes every day, and disposable alternatives are currently helpful to those people even if they recognize the environmental impact. An outright ban on regular people without taking action against the companies responsible for the current options is just misguided and directs anger at the wrong targets. |
环境 › Animal Testing
Personal answerYes, but only when absolutely necessary. |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
Personal answer不,社交媒体公司是私有公司,不应受政府监管 |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
Personal answer不,根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的 |
外交政策 › Taliban Financial Aid
Personal answer不 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
Personal answerYes, but only if their hormone levels are equivalent to those in the gender category in which they compete |
经济 › Four-day Workweek
Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
Personal answer不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性 |
国内政策 › 通勤火车
Personal answerYes, but with strict funding caps and tight security and environmental protections. |
环境 › Freshwater Research
Personal answerYes, but the $1 billion budget is too high |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment |
Housing › Foreign Owned Homes
Personal answerNo, implement foreign buyer and vacancy taxes instead |
外交政策 › Israel Boycott
Personal answerNo, while I disapprove of anyone who supports this boycott, a ban would be a violation of free speech |
罪行 › 假释听证会
Personal answer是的提供严格的心理评价表明他们不再是对社会的威胁 |
总统大选 › Political Party Subsidies
Personal answerYes, but only if all political parties receive the same amount |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
Personal answer是的,任何缴纳税费的人都应该有投票的权利 |
外交政策 › Ukrainian Defense Funding
Personal answerYes, and increase the current amount of resources we are providing |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
Personal answerYes, and create more social programs to provide free food, clothing, and medicine |
总统大选 › Mental competency testing
Personal answer是的 |
移民 › High Risk Immigrant Ban
Personal answer不 |
Housing › Affordable Housing
Personal answerYes, as long as these houses are affordable to the average Canadian income. Else it is wasted effort. |
外交政策 › 乌克兰
Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 北美自由贸易协议(NAFTA)
Personal answerYes, but balance trade between countries |
社会 › Teacher and Faculty Diversity Training
Personal answerYes, and all schools should require mandatory diversity training |
Housing › Home Buyer Incentives
Personal answerYes, and the government should limit the number of homes that can be bought by a single person or corporation |
Housing › Non-Resident Real Tax
Personal answerYes, and the tax should be at least 20% |
经济 › 国内工作
Personal answerno but increase the tax on them to reduce the national debt |
外交政策 › Gaza ceasefire
Personal answer是的 |
移民 › 双重国籍
Personal answer是,除非他们实施了恐怖主义行为 |
社会 › Student Diversity Training
Personal answerYes, and all schools should require mandatory diversity training |
外交政策 › 法案C-51
Personal answer不是,比尔是空泛的范围、 监督和问责制的问题 |
医保 › World Health Organization
Personal answerYes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute |
外交政策 › Weapon Sales Ethics
Personal answer是的 |
社会 › Employee Diversity Training
Personal answerYes, and all companies should require mandatory diversity training |
交通运输 › Green Transportation
Personal answerYes, and increase taxes and regulation of the fossil fuel industry |
外交政策 › Israeli Palestinian Conflict
Personal answerPalestine |
医保 › Medical Consensus
Personal answerYes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › CBC Funding
Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
Personal answer不 |
经济 › 养老保险费
Personal answer是的可以用更高的溢价来投资在经济和减少政府的责任,要给老人支付资金 |
外交政策 › Two State Solution for Israel and Palestine
Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 泛太平洋伙伴关系
Personal answerNo, this will incentivize companies to move jobs out of the country |
国内政策 › TikTok Ban
Personal answerNo, only ban the use on government issues phones |
环境 › Electric Vehicle Charging Stations
Personal answerYes, but only if they use renewable energy sources |
外交政策 › Hong Kong Fugitive Extradition
Personal answer不 |
经济 › State Ownership
Personal answerYes, the government should receive equity for any financial aid they provide to companies |
教育 › Charter Schools
Personal answerYes, but only if they are non-profit |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
Personal answerNo, the government should never subsidize private businesses |
外交政策 › Saudi Arabia and Iran
Personal answer不 |
教育 › University Debt Accountability
Personal answerNo, and higher education should be free for everyone |
经济 › Cryptocurrency
Personal answerNo, classify cryptocurrencies as unregulated commodities |
经济 › Decentralized Finance
Personal answerNo, and I don’t understand the concept of decentralized finance |
环境 › EV Subsidies
Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › CSA Funding
Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › Venezuela Sanctions
Personal answer不 |
经济 › Aluminum Quotas
Personal answerYes, but only on countries that put quotas on us |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “security”, meaning you more often believe the government should do everything within its power to ensure the security of its citizens. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side moderately towards “politically incorrect”, meaning you believe our society is becoming too sensitive to language that is direct and honest. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “nationalism”, meaning you more often support policies that prioritize the interests of our nation above others. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “decentralization”, meaning you more often believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on assimilation and multiculturalism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side moderately towards “left wing”, meaning you support policies that promote social and economic equality. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side extremely towards “deregulation”, meaning you very strongly believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on anthropocentrism and environmentalism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on big government and small government issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on tough and tender issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “multilateralism”, meaning you more often believe policy decisions should be made collectively with support of everyone who may be affected by the outcome of the decision. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on imperialism and isolationism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. 这一主题只是对你最重要的。
Based on 15 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 15 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 22 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 14 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 30 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.