Alex Ruff

Very strongly agree

No, this is nanny-state overreach and adults don't need the government to babysit them.

This matches core Conservative rhetoric about limiting government intrusion, opposing “nanny-state” policies, and emphasizing adult choice/personal responsibility—common themes in Conservative critiques of expansive public-health regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, excessive labeling will devastate our domestic wine and beer industry.

Conservatives frequently prioritize protecting domestic industries and jobs and argue against measures that add costs or harm competitiveness; they often frame such policies as burdensome regulation for small producers (e.g., craft beer/wineries).

Agree

No

More consistent with Conservative Party instincts against expanding federal regulation and mandated packaging requirements, especially where it affects consumer products and imposes compliance costs on producers/retailers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The federal Conservatives generally oppose new mandatory warning-label regimes as regulatory overreach and prefer education/targeted harm-reduction over broad product mandates; they have often campaigned on cutting “red tape” for businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, consumers have a right to know the direct link between alcohol and cancer.

While Conservatives may support consumer information in principle, framing it as a “direct link” and implying cigarette-style warnings aligns more with public-health regulatory approaches typically advanced by Liberals/NDP than Conservatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and we should also ban alcohol ads to stop normalizing a Class 1 carcinogen.

Banning alcohol ads is far beyond the Conservatives’ usual approach; the party typically resists broad advertising bans and sweeping public-health prohibitions, emphasizing personal responsibility and market freedom. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.