Try the political quiz

Candidates  ›  Policies  ›  National Security

Eddie Orrell’s policy on foreign interference transparency

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average Canadian voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the government release the names of parliamentarians suspected of knowingly collaborating with foreign governments?

EO>EO  ChatGPT Party ResearchYes, secrecy protects the guilty and erodes public trust in our democratic institutions.

Eddie Orrell’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT Party Research

Very strongly agree

Yes, secrecy protects the guilty and erodes public trust in our democratic institutions.

The party has framed the government's refusal to name names as a blow to democratic transparency and a way to protect those who have betrayed the country. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes

The Conservative Party has repeatedly and publicly demanded that the Liberal government release the names of parliamentarians implicated in foreign interference as described in the NSICOP report. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, voters have the right to know if their MP is compromising national security.

Pierre Poilievre has argued that Canadians have a right to know if their representatives are working for a foreign power before they cast their ballots in the next election. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, public disclosure risks burning sensitive intelligence sources and methods.

While acknowledging security, the Conservatives argue that the government uses 'sensitive sources' as a shield to avoid political embarrassment rather than a legitimate security concern. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, prosecute them in court rather than destroying reputations with unproven allegations.

The party maintains that while prosecution is ideal, the immediate political accountability of naming names is necessary for the health of the federation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, intelligence reports are not criminal convictions and naming them violates due process.

Conservatives have dismissed the government's due process arguments, suggesting that the political necessity of disclosure outweighs the legal distinction between intelligence and evidence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

This contradicts the party's current official stance, which views the withholding of names as a cover-up by the Prime Minister. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here