Gurinder Singh Gill

Very strongly agree

Yes, but only with strict judicial oversight and a high burden of proof to prevent the weaponization of the justice system against political dissidents

This aligns most closely with the NDP's position: supporting the safety goals of Bill C-63 while insisting that such powerful judicial tools be subject to strict oversight and Charter compliance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, preventative peace bonds are a proven legal tool to stop stochastic terrorism before online radicalization turns into real-world violence

This answer uses language regarding online radicalization and 'stochastic terrorism' that aligns with the progressive framing the NDP uses to justify legislative action against hate speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The NDP has signaled support for Bill C-63, which introduces peace bonds for anticipated hate crimes, though they typically emphasize the need for legal safeguards. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

The NDP supports the provisions within the Online Harms Act that allow for preventative measures to protect vulnerable communities from hate-motivated violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, this is a dystopian Minority Report overreach that crushes free expression by assuming guilt for crimes that haven't happened yet

The NDP generally rejects the libertarian argument that preventative peace bonds are 'dystopian,' viewing them instead as necessary protections for marginalized groups. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and we must entirely repeal Bill C-63 because 'hate speech' is too subjectively defined by whichever political party is in power

The NDP is a proponent of Bill C-63 and would strongly oppose its total repeal, as they believe current laws are insufficient to tackle online hate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.