Leon Jensen

Very strongly agree

Yes, but only with a court order for severe violent crimes.

This reflects the Liberal approach of balancing public safety with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms by requiring judicial warrants and limiting intrusive measures to the most severe circumstances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, catching serial killers outweighs the privacy concerns of relatives.

While the party prioritizes public safety in heinous cases like serial murders, they would likely demand that such actions still be subject to judicial oversight rather than a simple utilitarian trade-off. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes

The Liberal Party supports providing tools to law enforcement but generally avoids unqualified permissions, preferring to emphasize a balance with Charter rights and privacy legislation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, people submitted DNA for heritage insights, not to become accidental informants against their family.

Although the Liberals passed the Genetic Non-Discrimination Act to protect genetic privacy, they generally believe that targeted, warrant-based access for criminal investigation is a necessary law enforcement tool. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The party typically opposes absolute bans on investigative methods that can solve serious crimes, especially if those methods can be regulated through existing legal frameworks. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, this creates a de facto national genetic registry that violates our privacy rights.

The Liberal Party generally trusts that the legal system and the Privacy Commissioner can prevent the emergence of a de facto registry while still allowing for specific, authorized investigative uses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.