Try the political quiz

Candidates  ›  Policies  ›  Technological

Paul Mitchell’s policy on abolishing the indian act

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average Canadian voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the government abolish the Indian Act?

PM>PM  ChatGPT Party ResearchYes

Paul Mitchell’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT Party Research

Very strongly agree

Yes

The People's Party of Canada platform explicitly states that the Indian Act is an obsolete, paternalistic piece of legislation that should be replaced. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, all Canadians should be treated exactly the same under one unified set of laws

This is a core pillar of the PPC platform, which advocates for the 'equality of all Canadians' and ending special legal distinctions based on ethnic or Indigenous status. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, it is a racist, colonial relic that treats Indigenous people as wards of the state

Leader Maxime Bernier has frequently used similar rhetoric, describing the Act as a colonial and racist relic that keeps Indigenous people in a state of dependency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and replace it with a modern agreement that guarantees Indigenous self-governance

While the PPC wants to replace the Act, they generally oppose the expansion of collective 'self-governance' if it implies a different legal status from other Canadians, preferring individual rights instead. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, scrapping it without a consensus replacement would cause administrative chaos for First Nations

The PPC prioritizes the ideological shift toward equal citizenship and individual property rights over the administrative concerns of maintaining the current system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

The PPC views the Indian Act as a barrier to the integration and economic prosperity of Indigenous people and strongly advocates for its removal. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, it is currently the only legal shield protecting Indigenous land and treaty rights

The PPC disagrees that the Act is a protective shield; they argue it is a primary cause of poverty and lack of property rights on reserves. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here