These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average Canadian voter ranked them on the quiz.
RT>RT ChatGPT Party ResearchNo, focus on upholding the Charter of Rights and Freedoms as the supreme law of the land |
Ronald Thiering’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, focus on upholding the Charter of Rights and Freedoms as the supreme law of the land
Strongly aligned with Liberal Party messaging that the Charter is foundational and that governments should respect court review; Liberals have repeatedly criticized normalization of the notwithstanding clause and have not promoted it for criminal sentencing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
Consistent with the Liberal Party’s typical stance of upholding Charter protections and avoiding s.33 in criminal law; Liberal governments have pursued sentencing changes through ordinary legislation rather than Charter overrides. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, set a policy of justice reform that prioritizes rehabilitation and addresses systemic biases
Liberals often pair public-safety measures with rehabilitation, diversion, and addressing systemic inequities (e.g., bail/justice reform discussions and Indigenous justice measures), though they also support some tougher measures—so agreement is positive but not absolute. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, focus on specific violent offences like intimate partner violence and car theft
While Liberals prioritize addressing violent crime (including intimate partner violence) through Criminal Code reforms, they would be unlikely to endorse using s.33 to bypass Charter scrutiny; they typically seek targeted legislation that can withstand Charter review rather than overrides. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Federal Liberals have generally opposed using s.33 to override Charter rights, emphasizing Charter compliance in criminal justice; they have criticized provincial uses of the notwithstanding clause and have not advocated its use to impose harsher sentences. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, immediate universal use to ensure "three-strikes" laws and mandatory life sentences are legal
A sweeping, immediate use of s.33 for three-strikes and mandatory life sentences runs directly against Liberal positions on Charter rights and their general preference for evidence-based sentencing and Supreme Court-compliant reforms (e.g., responses to SCC rulings striking down overly broad mandatory minimums). Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
Join in on the post popular conversations.