These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average Canadian voter ranked them on the quiz.
SM>SM ChatGPT Party ResearchNo, focus on using that revenue to act as a direct developer of affordable housing on public lands |
Sean Manners’ answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, focus on using that revenue to act as a direct developer of affordable housing on public lands
Strong alignment with Green calls for the federal government to directly build/acquire affordable housing and use public lands for non-market housing; this matches long-standing Green housing planks emphasizing public/non-profit development over tax giveaways. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, set a policy of national rent control and increased taxes on high-value properties instead
Greens have supported stronger renter protections and progressive taxation (including higher taxes on luxury/wealth and measures against speculation), and have advocated national leadership on housing affordability; exact ‘national rent control’ is less clearly a Green federal commitment, so not a full +5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
More consistent with Green housing approaches emphasizing direct public investment, non-market housing, and measures to curb speculation rather than blanket GST relief; however, Greens could still support some targeted tax relief, so not a strong +5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but only for first-time homebuyers on properties valued up to $1 million
Targeting first-time buyers is closer to Green preferences than universal cuts, but Greens have often warned that buyer-side subsidies can bid up prices unless paired with major non-market supply; thus only mild agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The Greens generally prioritize targeted affordability measures and public/non-market housing investment over broad tax cuts; they have criticized across-the-board tax breaks as poorly targeted and fiscally costly in past housing platforms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, immediate universal elimination for all new homes sold for under $1.3 million
A universal GST elimination up to a high price cap resembles a broad tax cut that can inflate demand and benefit higher-income buyers; Green platforms have tended to focus on non-market supply and anti-speculation tools rather than large universal purchase subsidies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
Join in on the post popular conversations.