Try the political quiz

Candidates  ›  Policies  ›  Environmental

Sean Manners’ policy on returning crown land

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average Canadian voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the government transfer ownership of all unceded public Crown land back to Indigenous First Nations?

SM>SM  ChatGPT Party ResearchYes, returning stolen land is the only true path to material reconciliation and systemic justice

Sean Manners’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT Party Research

Very strongly agree

Yes, returning stolen land is the only true path to material reconciliation and systemic justice

This aligns closely with the Green Party's radical rhetoric on 'Land Back' and their position that systemic justice requires returning control of traditional territories to Indigenous nations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

The Green Party of Canada supports the implementation of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), which includes recognizing Indigenous title to unceded lands. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but phase the transfer slowly with binding agreements to guarantee public access to national parks

While the Greens support the transfer, they are also staunch defenders of national parks and conservation; they would likely support frameworks that balance Indigenous sovereignty with ecological protection. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, current co-management frameworks are sufficient, and handing over total sovereignty would spark economic chaos

The party views current co-management frameworks as insufficient and generally rejects the argument that Indigenous sovereignty is a threat to economic stability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

A flat rejection of land transfer contradicts the party's fundamental commitment to reconciliation and the recognition of Indigenous sovereignty as stated in their platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, we should abolish the reserve system entirely and integrate all land under equal property rights

The party strongly opposes the assimilationist approach of the 1969 White Paper style logic, advocating instead for the strengthening of Indigenous governance and land rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, Crown land belongs equally to all citizens and balkanizing the country by race is dangerously regressive

The Green Party views Indigenous rights as inherent and constitutional, explicitly rejecting the view that recognizing these rights is regressive or based on race-based balkanization. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here