Canadian officers say women warriors proved as effective as men in front-line combat roles in Ottawa's most recent big military engagement, in Afghanistan from 2002 to 2011. But Canada has struggled to fill combat jobs with women, and those who do join can feel isolated as a result. And like Cpl. Moman, many of the women who volunteered for these jobs got the impression that their senior officers used them only sparingly in combat. Proponents argue that it will help the military retain more women, who tend to leave the services permanently when they have children. Opponents argue that allowing women to serve in these roles would limit the military's ability to fight in combat situations.
Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Ideology:
Political party:
Province/Territory:
@ISIDEWITH8mos8MO
How would you feel if someone close to you wanted to join the military and serve in a combat role?
@9XHQN826mos6MO
I feel that is their right, and anyone who wants to sign up to fight the governments' fights for them should be able to.
@9X4XJVH6mos6MO
i believe they have the right to choose what they want to do while risking there lives.
@9WXF8RTNew Democratic6mos6MO
Anyone should be able to freely choose to sell their body to the government and die in imperialist wars
@9WL6S5Y6mos6MO
There should be a mandatory physical and mental test to complete in order to serve in combat and gender should not be an issue.
@4VTK4QQ4yrs4Y
men and women in a group = couples
@9J4QTKJConservative1yr1Y
Yes, women are able to be as strong as men. There should be a promotion in the target audience for women to serve. There should be sexual assault provention programs and other programs to help women in the force.
@4GYKCFB5yrs5Y
If men can decide to take up arms whether for their own personal economic reasons or their beliefs than women must be allowed and have the duty to take up arms as well. If women are allowed to vote they must be conscripted at the same rate as men. If a woman's ability on the battlefield in combat may make her more vulnerable than a man, and even a liability as well, this needs to be reflected in conscription at a higher rate of woman than men to compensate.
@4QCM3LH5yrs5Y
women serve is Israel...look to them for information on how to utilize women in the armed forces
@44NDCMP5yrs5Y
Not if they are mothers and have small children at home, it is in my believe that a child needs his or her mother to raise them. They actually need both but most importantly the mother for nurturing them.
@4TR5DWK5yrs5Y
Let us look at the damage combat has done to men both physically and mentally. It destroyed them for any future civilian life. Our women do not deserve this, even if they might perform well under constant bombardment.
@B54CHGM3 days3D
Unless things get really bad with the rate of soilders dying women should not go into combat rules unless they complete the physical roles as men
@B4ZC8M51wk1W
As long as they are just as capable as a man in combat and make the work environment safe from sexual assault from their colleagues
@B4VB3F32wks2W
Yes as preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men as many women on average are not as physically capable as men for combat, combat roles place women in a high risk situation for sexual assault and women must be informed of this and consent to the risk, men are also more likely to risk the success of a mission in order to protect a women from danger and as such she cannot be allowed any preferential treatment as a rule
@B4PS5QV2wks2W
I don't like the idea of woman dying in combat, because woman are precious and deserve to not be. scientifically speaking woman are less strong and fast as a man so if it comes down to hand to hand combat, the woman is not black widow or wonder woman she will get destroyed by a military trained man. So my answer is no.
@B3G3R7S2mos2MO
Yes, if women are trained and prepared appropriately and have the strength, endurance and capacity to do the job involved in combat. It is a personal choice and also the ability to do the job. If an assault does occur it should be supported regardless if it happens to men or women.
@9YK7T9B6mos6MO
Not allowing women to serve is discrimination, but the military right now is rife with sexual violence and that is a more pressing concern
@9VZWW2H7mos7MO
I think that women should have the option, but just like everyone, they need to understand the risks and be prepared to be treated the same when it comes to serving our country
@9656D9T3yrs3Y
i believe with the right amount of training a women should be allowed to serve in combat
@9JWZHWW1yr1Y
Yes, but we shouldn't get ourselves involved in anything that would result in combat situations taking place.
@9GZYG4J1yr1Y
No, unless that involve piloting robotic unmanned devices where women would be more likely suited than men for the task require for such position.
@9FM9QN92yrs2Y
Yes, as long as they're worthy and qualified.
@9F5KMPV2yrs2Y
A person of any gender should be allowed to join the military if they want. Not hiring based on gender is discrimination.
@9D4V5MC2yrs2Y
Yes, they already do and have done for decades.
@96CJFM3New Democratic3yrs3Y
Gender should be irrelevant, and only the measurement of physical aptitude should be used.
@95BRPDN3yrs3Y
There should be more effort put into ensuring there are fewer combat rolls. This being said, women should be allowed to serve in combat rolls. Increased prevention of sexual assault should be put in place.
@9RQNPMR9mos9MO
That decision should depend on the individual and their commanding officer. Those who know the situation at hand
@98S47972yrs2Y
Yes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men and because not giving woman a chance is being discriminative
@4TY2NWN5yrs5Y
no send them back to the kitchen
@9C63S732yrs2Y
I do not care what they do. their life not mine.
@95SJ7543yrs3Y
No because no one should be in the military
@9464RF93yrs3Y
@945L3BV3yrs3Y
Yes, combat roles should be judged based on performance and ability, not gender.
@9449HS33yrs3Y
If they are as competent as the men
@942SC4B3yrs3Y
We do not need a military for combat
@8XKT3BG3yrs3Y
Yes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men and that she is informed of the risk that it represent for her (Rape, Injury, Etc.). (the male must be punished if they touch in an inappropriate way and after kick out of the military).
@8WZ4NMB4yrs4Y
If they are well qualified for the job, why not
@8VH22SV4yrs4Y
Women and children should be protected.
@8V7LPJX4yrs4Y
I served with women who I trusted because they earned that right. If earned, YES
@8V23N8YNew Democratic4yrs4Y
I don't agree with military in general.
@8TZPR694yrs4Y
No, no one should serve in the military
@8TYV78F4yrs4Y
F the person that wrote some of these options, it's disgusting. Of course, they should be allowed. "Higher risk for sexual assault" only means "more rapists"
@8TXVXML4yrs4Y
No, it's dishonorable to hide behind a woman.
@8TWKYGX4yrs4Y
Yes, and stop sexism and sexual harassment
@8TW3T394yrs4Y
no i don’t support the military
Yes, as long as they can pass any test/evaluation needed in order to serve
@8TQTW27New Democratic4yrs4Y
Yes, but with the acknowledgement of the sad reality that women in combat roles will face dangers that men often don't
@8SDPH6Y4yrs4Y
No, women should be in the kitchen.
@8T2CVZS4yrs4Y
they shouldn't have roles like infantry because the military had to lower their expectations 3 times for women to be in the military
@8SCRSMG4yrs4Y
Yes but there should be a unisex standard of fitness
@8RLZ9JT4yrs4Y
Experience and skills are more important then sex.
@8QT9385Conservative4yrs4Y
Yes, as long as they can do the job as they should
@8QSJWV74yrs4Y
Yes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men but there should be programs in place that will protect them from sexual assault.
@8QDY7CX4yrs4Y
Yes as long as the can complete the required training to the same standard as everyone else.
@8PYQT8Q4yrs4Y
Preventing them from filling those roles is discriminatory, also women greatly benefit military operations.
No, but men shouldn't be allowed either
No I believe we shouldn’t even have the military.
@tofutofu4yrs4Y
Yes, otherwise it would be discrimination. However, sexual assault is a real issue that needs to be given attention.
@8NHT9HF4yrs4Y
Yes, if they choose to and have the training to do so, also put programs in place protect them from sexual assault from their coworkers
@8JDRVHP5yrs5Y
Yes, as long as they pass the required physical tests for the strength of the woman and/or tests to be able to complete the job task given
@8HT3B6K5yrs5Y
yes, and more should be done about the high risk of sexual assault for them
@8D8S5H25yrs5Y
As long as they can capably complete the missions and they agree to the risks
@8CM5QDJNew Democratic5yrs5Y
Yes, but there should be regulations to protect women from sexual assault, on top of awareness for men to not risk the success to protect a women from danger either and vice versa...
Deleted2yrs2Y
Yes, as long as they can pass the same physical and psychological tests as men. Also make these tests more difficult.
@9CCVGFR2yrs2Y
I do not care about the military
@9C7WYWV2yrs2Y
Depends on the what the woman wants
@9BCJ5ZT2yrs2Y
The military needs to be disbanded and restructured
@99F7DQZ2yrs2Y
Abolish the military and replace it with a people's army
@99B9Y7X2yrs2Y
Yes if a woman insists on it, and knows the special risks. Women are best in treating wounded, and doing a million other supportive tasks, also intelligence,as they can be super smart.
@98DXRC22yrs2Y
They could, because they’re equal to men. But realistically who in their right mind would want to serve a combat purpose period?!
@93BCGRF3yrs3Y
i dont support the military in general
@8VJ8ZRD4yrs4Y
Yes, as long as they pass all the requirements
@8VJ7P3X4yrs4Y
Yes as long as the test examines a man’s fitness
@8VHSYBT4yrs4Y
Yes, but sexual assault is a big thing that needs to be stopped.
@8VC9XFB4yrs4Y
Nobody should serve in a combat role. It is time to end all war!!!
@8V3TFD4New Democratic4yrs4Y
No, I don’t care about having more female war criminals
@93P92RN3yrs3Y
We don’t need an armed forces
@936KWVL3yrs3Y
In non-spec ops roles, sure
@92PQBJW3yrs3Y
Yes, everyone has the right and ability to live out die for their country.
@8VSLZ6P4yrs4Y
Women should be required to serve in combat roles equally to Men.
@8VRT2TJ4yrs4Y
There shouldn't be any military in general
@8VPZYZJ4yrs4Y
Yes, as long as ability is proven. For any gender.
@8VN29JT4yrs4Y
War is stupid and no man or woman should have to go into combat because our political leaders can not find a diplomatic solution.
@8VMXKNFNew Democratic4yrs4Y
Get rid of the military and use the funds for something actually meaningful.
@8VLHZMB4yrs4Y
If they want to they should be allowed. The choice should be their own - no one else's
@8VJNWNB4yrs4Y
No, a nation should not risk women's lives in combat
@8V4643B4yrs4Y
It’s not something I have an opinion on.
@8SFZFZC4yrs4Y
Yes, only if they chose to.
@8SDR3QB4yrs4Y
yes, women are as good as men
@7FSXLL75yrs5Y
No, we should be defunding and scaling back the military, starting with combat roles.
@6Y9S3783yrs3Y
Yes, but slowly abolish the military altogether
@8TMFV7P3yrs3Y
Yes, if they can pass the same physical tests as men, and the tests should be made tuffer
@528HJMS4yrs4Y
No unless they can pass the same physical tests as men
@heatherdvdprincess3yrs3Y
Yes, preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory, but they should still have to meet the same requirements, and should not be drafted into combat roles. They should also be offered free birth control to prevent problems from rape by enemies.
@6Y7R42C5yrs5Y
No because that just means the American Empire will have more soldiers
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
