Should “gender identity” be added to anti-discrimination laws?

It depends upon how it is used. Like if they are brutally murdered for being trans then yes but i feel someone would use this law as "someone misgendered me put them in jail"

Yes, as long as there are clear limitations on what "gender identity" means

Yes As long as it doesn’t infringe upon free speech or other rights

Yes, however, there should be a distinction between one being confused about another's gender and, discriminating against someone due to their gender.

No, it is already covered and should be only applicable to transgendered people, not people who decide they don't like gender roles and decide to be non-binary.

For the purpose of the government, protectivelaws should be based on sex, not gender. This would still protect the gay community.

It should not be. if you have a PP you are a man, a Hole there and you are a woman, there are no other combinations. and what your birth sex is is what you are.

Yes, but on certain restrictions

I lean more towards yes. Some people feel that they do not socially fit into the male or female boundaries but I don't really know that much about this.

if that person is happy do what they please in that situation so not yes and not no

I need more explanation. like perhaps re word it or sum?

There are biologically more than 2 genders :) There is something called "intersex", which is the third biological gender, in case you didn't know. Non-binary exist naturally.

Yes and no. It depends on how sensitive the person is towards the subject.

I don't really care what people say their genders are

No, gender identity is too vague and subjective, and would would conflict of free speech. As is hate speech. Trans can do and identify with what they want, but do NOT legislate speech!

People with legitimate issues shouldn't be discriminated against, however there is a large subgroup of that culture that's using the litigation as a shield and playing a different power game that I would consider unethical, though I haven't given it enough investigation to determine exactly what's going on there.

If you’re a plant people should laugh at you. Other than that, I support gender identity added to anti-discrimination laws.

Yes, but don't make the non-adherence a criminal matter

I am for gender identity however I don’t think it should have legal ramifications if someone does not respect it unless it violates the person who has gender identity charter of rights

No, anti-discrimination laws are too subjective and infringe on our freedom and liberties.

theres only man and women

No, but I believe being more respectful to people who don't fall under situated gender categories is necessary.

you can i identify as what ever you want but that dont mean u are that gender u just prefer 2 be none as it

If intentionally used as a sourse of harrasment/bullying you should be charged, but not for small issues such as messing up pro nouns

No it shouldn't because its getting ridiculous at this point

No, all discrimination is wrong, therefore laws should not be made for special interests or minorities.

It's important that people give others the chance to try and understand different gender identities and not be criminalized for adaptation time

Yes but as I stated before, everyone's entitled to opinions in a moral and ethical extent, ie discrimination should be looked down upon.

Yes, but descrimination laws should be universal

No, It is too much of Anti-discrimination.

If the pronouns are not weird

their own choice

I think all people should be treated with respect and not discriminated against but I do think gender identity is linked with mental health

Sex is a biological and unchangeable thing. Gender identify his more of a social thing, a social identity. Gender identity needs to be respected but we can't put it in laws, because it is something that can change. In laws identity needs to be solid, in things like legal documents and passports for example.

i can not respond to this question at this time

сложно ответить на этот вопрос

Gender is gender be who u wanna be

no, only biological “genders” should be recognized.

I don’t understand the context/question

Yes but only if someones isn't claiming there gender identity something completely absurd for example a potato just to draw attention.

they're making gender identity too big of an issue when we should be focussing on over stuff. gender identity is important to an extent but is over ruled in some circumstances.

We should define gender and agree about what were actually talking about before making a decision

Yes and stop sacrificing women's rights to appease your white guilt.

And I have Zero use for one Jordan Petersons viewpoints and rhetoric. I think his podcast fuels social and political discord.

idek what this means

It's not myproblem nor myown fight.

Depends on the impact, sports teams no, firing yes