Try the political quiz

0 Reply

 @8CYCP9Vfrom Alberta answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but money should be focused to the families that have a low 'combined' income

 @8RF256Zfrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

 @8Q8NHDPfrom British Columbia answered…3yrs3Y

The government should subsidize home buyers who make less than $100K per year.

 @8CYWH9Kfrom Quebec answered…4yrs4Y

 @8TVYS42from Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

No, government should encourage denser housing construction, penalize multiple ownership, and ban foreign buyers.

 @9LNL99Nfrom Ontario answered…7 days7D

I think it depends on the situation, the government should totally lower house prices but the person have to pay for the house. Anyone should pay for there house but the prices should be lowered

 @9LF9HLPfrom Manitoba answered…2wks2W

The government needs to force housing prices down, they have gotten out of control. We will need a plan that punishes those who have helped create the absurd prices.

 @9LD8F4Qfrom Alberta answered…3wks3W

No, and reduce inflation, stop immigration, and send everyone who’s immigrated here in the last 10 years back to their home countries so that we can have our country back for ourselves—less people is what we need, not more homes.

 @9L2NYDLfrom Ontario answered…1mo1MO

The government should subsidize home buyers regardless of how much they make maybe through a home contribution fund from the taxes

 @9KZNNL9from Ontario answered…1mo1MO

Focus on the economy don’t subsidize and limit the amount of home a single person/ corporation can buy

 @9KDYD2Wfrom Saskatchewan answered…2mos2MO

No, but they should also limit the number of homes available to be bought by a person or corporation

 @9KBFTYW from British Columbia answered…2mos2MO

No, but the system of home building and purchasing needs to be regulated or reformed so that the current inflationary, predatory lending, and artificial pricing needs to stop.

 @9K92VNMfrom Ontario answered…2mos2MO

Lower costs of homes and limit the number of housing that can be bought to prevent money laundering.

 @9JZV4G6Conservativefrom Ontario answered…2mos2MO

No subsidizing. Make Canada an affordable country again. My grocery bill before "covid" was $150/week. It is now $200-300 per week now - whether we get meat or forego it. My 3 bedroom apartment that has the water off - at least once per month for the whole day - $2410/month. No backyard. No space. Rude neighbours. Owning a house, with a garage should not be $800,000+.

I should be able to get a position as an EA that is fulltime and permanent. But government restrictions. I should make more like $32/hour because I'm worth it. I shouldn't need to have over $120,000 saved, to buy a home. Our government is why I live pay to pay, and I am not the only provider here.

 @9JZDBDSfrom Ontario answered…2mos2MO

Existing Home owners are greatly subsidized; there is space to help new home owners, but renters should also be put on par — renters don’t have exemptions from capital gains on any investments. Best to overturn zoning and increase supply; also make it difficult for REITs to make money on land; remove incentives to own more than one property

 @9JVPMV2from Manitoba answered…2mos2MO

No, fix the problems regarding home affordability, overall cost of living and the artificial inflation of housing and there will no longer be a need to subsidize housing.

 @9JVMDVDConservativefrom Ontario answered…2mos2MO

Government should instead invest in building more houses and lower permit requirements for construction

 @9JT36CNfrom Alberta answered…3mos3MO

their should be a regulation on housing bought buy foreign party's not in Canada or come to Canada using them as investments

 @9JRN9GNfrom Alberta answered…3mos3MO

It should be given to people with fair reasons for it, but there should be a time limit on how long the government provides this

 @9JK53DWfrom Alberta answered…3mos3MO

Housing should have a cap on how much builders and private sellers can sell for everyone deserves a warm place to sleep

 @9JHHFFYNew Democraticfrom Ontario answered…3mos3MO

Corporations should not be allowed to own any single family homes. Sinlge family homes are for families.

 @9JC6BKVfrom Ontario answered…3mos3MO

Banks and Lenders should be regulated in a way to discourage the bubble cycle that's contributing to the massive inflation in the housing market.

 @9JBR3N6from Ontario answered…3mos3MO

Government should check identity of buyers since they bought multiple properties on the identity of their family members. It should be avoided.

 @9GNXXXTfrom British Columbia answered…6mos6MO

There should be CMHC mortgage loans that provide stability to lower incomes, and help them afford a house alongside other Canadian home owners.

 @9GNFHVZLiberalfrom Ontario answered…6mos6MO

I think that the government should build more homes and decrease the prices because they are too high to live.

 @9GJPKWTfrom Ontario answered…6mos6MO

The government should allow for individuals making less than 120k to submit receipts for housing costs and evaluate based on household spending against housing costs to determine appropriate tax breaks.

 @9GG6WCKfrom Ontario answered…6mos6MO

I do not think that the government should subside for the people making less money but maybe implicate a few homes that are more affordable for this reason

 @9GFVHJMfrom Ontario answered…6mos6MO

it depends because 120k per year is still alot but if they are making very little amounts then yes the government should assist them

 @9GBGRC6from Alberta answered…6mos6MO

Yes if the base cost of living in Canada exceeds a threshold. Currently, this would be of help to current or potential home owners

 @9G9MV2Tfrom Ontario answered…6mos6MO

no but i would say yes if the income was lower. if the average income is $40,000 then $120,000 would cover too many people and we could not afford it.

 @9G9MRGSfrom Alberta answered…6mos6MO

The govt’t should subsidize homebuyers by allowing low-interest mortgages for households who make less than 100k per year.

 @9G8W3TGfrom Ontario answered…6mos6MO

If the family has only one child,I don't think it's necessary,but if there are many children,,I think subsidies are needed.

 @9FTFDYYGreenfrom Ontario answered…7mos7MO

The government should subsidize those who were originally able to afford a home on their salary, but may lose it to circumstances evidently out of control.

 @9FT9JTLfrom Alberta answered…7mos7MO

If they are making a really low income, then yes, if they are making steady income and wasting it no

 @8W9QTK5from Alberta answered…3yrs3Y

 @8W87XHSLiberalfrom British Columbia answered…3yrs3Y

 @8W65SXTfrom British Columbia answered…3yrs3Y

No, if you have the money to do so there should be nothing wrong with owning a number of homes.

 @8W4TQ2Mfrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

No because why does it matter and why should the goverment care about how many houses a single person buys.

 @8VZCTFDfrom Alberta answered…3yrs3Y

No it’s not the governments job to pay for your living/life style so people can be lazy burdens.

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...