The World Health Organization was founded in 1948 and is a specialized agency of the United Nations whose main objective is “the attainment by all peoples of the highest possible level of health.” The organization provides technical assistance to countries, sets international health standards and guidelines, and collects data on global health issues through the World Health Survey. The WHO has led global public health efforts including the development of an Ebola Vaccine and the near-eradication of polio and smallpox. The organization is run by a decision-making body composed…
Read more@8CJHZT24yrs4Y
@9GNXXXT6mos6MO
Yes, as there are other powers such as China and Russia who contribute to it, and we should call for necessary reforms.
@9G397D97mos7MO
The WHO was founded by the UN and should be funded by the UN as well. Canada should do its relative part.
@9FRKFKN7mos7MO
Yes but not negatively affecting us and have a system that calculates a fair amount for each country
@9FFPJHK7mos7MO
Yes, but there needs to be more transparency and oversight
@9F928G68mos8MO
Yes, but proportionately based on our GDP.
@9F5KMPV8mos8MO
The world health organization is useful for everyone. Every country that should afford it should contribute. Canada can help fund important medical research on the international stage.
@9DYV2PR8mos8MO
I don't have an idea about this.
@8R26JKW3yrs3Y
No, abolish the W.H.O. it has shown to be biased, ineffective and we should just fund national and local programmes instead.
@8KSCNJ43yrs3Y
I would need more information to answer this question
@8KLHHQY4yrs4Y
No, leave the World Health Organization as it has shown to be ineffective and we should only fund national and local programming.
@9D536B29mos9MO
Yes, but also fund national and local programs instead
Yes, and help reform it and make it a better institution as it does have potential.
@9BVK49712mos12MO
NO the WHO is fully corrupt and is controlled by private money and interests
@9B7SW331yr1Y
Only for life saving humanitarian aid. NOT programs that promote preferences
@995WHT51yr1Y
Yes, but not to the point where it might endanger people who have low income
@98HHR5F1yr1Y
Yes, but only within reasonable limits.
@98H6TCC1yr1Y
Yes but with limitations. And also fund national and local programs too
@97WSTML1yr1Y
Yes but an amount which the country is able to support
@97WDKK81yr1Y
No, it has shown to be ineffective, fudned by big pharmaceutical companies and we should only fund national and local programmes instead
@97B88MQConservative1yr1Y
No, Actively Denounce The WHO For The Scam It Is and Fund National and Local Programs Instead
@95GGRLN2yrs2Y
I need to know more information before committing an answer
@94CXG6G2yrs2Y
No, we should not fund it and abolish it completely.
@942M3262yrs2Y
No, it has shown to be ineffective and paid off by big pharmaceutical companies and only fund national and local programmes.
@93TM7X62yrs2Y
No, it has shown to be inept, ineffective and paid off by big pharma companies to violate the Nuremberg Code and other medical laws.
@936KWVL2yrs2Y
The World Health Organization is little more than a Cummunist Party of China functionaries. It has absolutely no place in any western society
@8ZSJL5B2yrs2Y
@8W2NLQVNew Democratic3yrs3Y
They were not proactive when Covid-19 broke out, however, Canada should still contribute a little.
@8VTCRZC3yrs3Y
@8VLMFCT3yrs3Y
Yes, but with our deficit repayment dictating how much extra funds can be contributed
@8VJVNDV3yrs3Y
WHO needs to be re-established with better representation from Canada with no self interest by the person appointed.
@8VJM5723yrs3Y
Yes, but prioritize national and local programs
@8VJM8XW3yrs3Y
No, they are definitely biased and failed us miserably!
@8VJH2553yrs3Y
.. irresponsible spending and corruption
@8VGZQ7W3yrs3Y
No, we need to get away from the global collective good of the UN and WEF and focus on every Canadian
@8VDZRFN3yrs3Y
Yes, maintaining the rate while an investigation into the WHO takes place.
@8VDQNYX3yrs3Y
The world Health organization should fund country's in Need of health care, More wealthy country's should help fund, more funding more benefits for ev
@8VBQJL5Conservative3yrs3Y
Yes, with more accountibility
@8V95QN23yrs3Y
No, it has shown to be ineffective, biased and we should only fund national and local healthcare instead.
@8V5L5V63yrs3Y
yes but to the degree that is beneficial to the organization while not compromising the internal national economy
@8TYQTG53yrs3Y
As long as it supports the growth of other countries less fortunate
@8TXJ32Y3yrs3Y
No because we listen to our own doctors anyways and not the WHO. Why fund something we don’t use the resources for
@8TX57HB3yrs3Y
No, we should have own like Tiawan
@8TWYK3L3yrs3Y
Yes, but transparency is important to the people.
The WHO needs to be independently reviewed for clarity, efficacy and consistency - if there is a global standard it should be used solely
@8TNDXCT3yrs3Y
No, fund only Canadian programmes and it has shown to be ineffective.
@8TF629D3yrs3Y
No, abolish the W.H.O. It has shown to be ineffective and in cahoots with other countries. Only fund Canadian programmes instead
@8ST6S8R3yrs3Y
No, not after the covid "pandemic" fiasco. Shame on the WHO, CDC, and Canadian politicians and medical community.
@8SF7HN33yrs3Y
Yes, but put more focus into national and local programs
@8S9KM983yrs3Y
Yes in the interim. However, an investigation needs to be done into the organization once the pandemic subsides to determine their impartiality and see from there whether it is within the best interests of us to keep funding them or instead direct our efforts inwards.
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
