Try the political quiz

0 Reply

 @Waterworks123from Alberta answered…3yrs3Y

 @heatherdvdprincessanswered…2yrs2Y

They should check the current subconscious and conscious racism of each person and require training only if needed. Otherwise, "color blind" people will be reminded that people are acutely aware of the difference in color, and will become more conscious of it and thus less color blind. I know from experience, as my colorblindness was temporarily tainted by being taught critical race theory.

 @92YHQCV from California answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, as long as it A. covers all protected groups (age, sex, race, disability, sexual orientation, religion), B. is not based on critical race theory, C. also include LGBTQ+ topics, and D. extends the requirement to private companies as well

 @9334YP3answered…2yrs2Y

No, on the contrary, racial sensitivity trainings should be made illegal.

 @92T58MH from Illinois answered…2yrs2Y

 @92MRDHD from Tennessee answered…2yrs2Y

No, the government shouldn't be forcing people to do anything. Offer incentives instead

 @heatherdvdprincessanswered…2yrs2Y

They should check the current subconscious and conscious racism of each person and require training only if needed. Otherwise, "color blind" people will be reminded that people are acutely aware of the difference in color, and will become more conscious of it and thus less color blind.

 @8ZLD3KV from Oklahoma answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, and it should be extended to all protected groups. All discriminatory acts should also be penalized.

 @8YT6XX7 from Indiana answered…2yrs2Y

We shouldn't even need to have this. People shouldn't care about color, it's kinda stupid knowing that someone has even brought this up to teach ADULTS or just WORKING PEOPLE to not mind color. Idk if that is what that even means but the way I read it does make it seem like that.

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, and extend the requirement to private companies with 100+ employees as well

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, and extend the requirement to private companies with 100 + employees as well

 @OtterZzzzz from Minnesota answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VC7WDN from North Carolina answered…3yrs3Y

 @shawnxavior234 from Florida answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, and include LGBTQIA+ issues, disability awareness, and feminism standpoints. This should also be required for all companies in our country, regardless of size or the type of work place.

 @8TP6QKSanswered…3yrs3Y

No, but minorities should be provided with optional trainings to grow-a-spine

 @8TLX3KS from Texas answered…3yrs3Y

 @3KHD56Canswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, and it should cover all disenfranchised groups and be required of private companies as well.

 @8T8SDXB from Connecticut answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, as long as it is based on cultural humility and critical race theory.

 @8RSRZ2H from Colorado answered…3yrs3Y

No, racial sensitivity shouldn't be something that people are trained, it just be known.

 @8QDSNZY from New York answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, as long as it covers all protected groups (age, sex, race, disability, sexual orientation, religion).

 @8Q6C4Y4 from Florida answered…3yrs3Y

No, if businesses want to they can, but the government shouldn't have the power to force them

 @MilesBHuff from Michigan answered…3yrs3Y

No, this training is often, itself, extremely racist, and only serves to inflame existing tensions

 @8P84BV6 from Minnesota answered…3yrs3Y

 @8M2BGYV from Michigan answered…3yrs3Y

 @8MF2HYV from Maine answered…3yrs3Y

Yes and there should also be training around all protected groups (age, gender, race, ability, sexual orientation, religion).

 @8LGDJZH from West Virginia answered…3yrs3Y

 @8KRN6JB from Ohio answered…3yrs3Y

Everyone should have a decent sense of empathy in matters like that.

 @8KX67Q9 from California answered…3yrs3Y

No, federally mandating racial sensitivity training is insincere. It should be optional and there should be clear guidelines, accountability, and action for acts of discrimination regardless.

 @593F7MNanswered…3yrs3Y

The more we continue to focus on our racial differences the longer the issue will continue

 @4V4VGHManswered…4yrs4Y

No, and it shouldn't exist. These programs tend to be very one sided and hypocritical.

 @8HT6RL4 from Utah answered…4yrs4Y

No, not until critical theory is no longer involved with modern sociology practices

 @jennamarieanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes, as long as it covers all protected groups (age, sex, race, disability, sexual orientation, religion) and is not based on critical race theory, and extend the requirement to private companies as well