Try the political quiz
@ISIDEWITHQuestionstransportationStarted 11mos agoActive 1wk ago

Should the government implement stricter emissions standards for diesel vehicles?

Diesel emissions standards regulate the amount of pollutants that diesel engines can emit to reduce air pollution. Proponents argue that stricter standards improve air quality and public health by reducing harmful emissions. Opponents argue that it increases costs for manufacturers and consumers and could reduce the availability of diesel vehicles.

+
Expand
+ Settings

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

31 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...11mos11MO

Yes

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...11mos11MO

No

 @B46V7MRLibertarianfrom Alberta  answered…1wk1W

The government should remove existing emissions standards and crash safety standards so that new vehicles can be purchased for sub 10k, and provide economic opportunity and freedom of movement for a lower price

 @B3CPZL7answered…1mo1MO

Should the Ireland prime minister uplifting gas prices is an power for petrols needs issues by new Zealand labour party leader and prime minister is ending of markings

 @B35Q7K5answered…1mo1MO

Gov't should reward companies/owner-operators for making more eco-friendly choices to encourage demand for options that are better for environment

 @B2R6534Liberalfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

Yes because diesel engines emit high levels of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and particulate matter, which contribute to smog and respiratory illnesses.

 @B2CMT6Q  from Montana  answered…3mos3MO

Yes, while diesel is more fuel efficient than gasoline it produces more carbon dioxide emissions than gasoline does.

 @B23B8DTPeople’sfrom Saskatchewan  answered…4mos4MO

climate change is a joke and implementing more harsher policies will only be more costly for not only citizens but these policies are expensive to put into place

 @B2CMT6Q from Montana  disagreed…3mos3MO

#1 Engaged Climate Change

There's more evidence supporting climate change than there is to deny it

"There is unequivocal evidence that Earth is warming at an unprecedented rate. Human activity is the principal cause."Evidence - NASA Sciencehttps://science.nasa.gov/climate-change/evidence/

Ever since the Earth has existed, there has been periods of changes in climate due to a plethora of reasons, and simply disregarding it without any concrete evidence should not be how one forms an opinion.

 @9ZMRC28from Ontario  answered…5mos5MO

Government should work towards making infastrucutre to support a smooth transition to electric cars for citizens

 @9ZH2FNQfrom Manitoba  answered…5mos5MO

diesel vehicles are the best they shouldnt have stricter standards

 @9ZG8R7Qfrom Alberta  answered…5mos5MO

Essential equipment and services like farming and heavy transportation should be exempt. Personal diesels should have Stricker standards.

 @9ZF4M8Jfrom Ontario  answered…5mos5MO

Whatever they choose to do should not impact the working class any more than industry

 @9TP4MHSfrom Alberta  answered…7mos7MO

Yes, but should also start reducing diesel vehicals in general

 @9NSN4GZConservativefrom British Columbia  answered…10mos10MO

No, emission or not safer environmental methods are not clear yet

 @9WQ4K26from Alberta  answered…5mos5MO

Yes, as long it doesn't negitively impact the consumer

 @9VY5FM6Conservativeanswered…6mos6MO

No. The emissions parts on pickup trucks are rushed technology and the parts are STILL breaking down 12 years later at enormous cost to consumers. Reduce the standards until reliable tech is developed.

 @9SLJBJVfrom British Columbia  answered…7mos7MO

Not unless there are comparably priced vehicle options

 @9RCTFJ2New Democraticfrom Manitoba  answered…8mos8MO

Yes, and limit usage and purpose, as well as addressing design/safety.

 @9P8NRFMNew Democratic from Alberta  answered…10mos10MO

Yes, diesel engines produce emissions similarly to petroleum powered engines.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

How would improving air quality in your city change your daily activities or health?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

What's your take on balancing economic growth with environmental policies, especially in the context of vehicle emissions?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

Have you or someone you know been directly affected by air pollution, and how do you think changes in diesel emission standards could affect this?

 @9ZK3JNSfrom British Columbia  answered…5mos5MO

No, we should deregulate the emissions standards on diesel vehicles and mandate the deletion of DEF systems on all new diesel engines.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

How do you feel about the trade-offs between stricter environmental regulations and potential increases in vehicle costs?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

Can you envision a future where diesel vehicles are no longer used? What do you imagine would be the challenges and benefits?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

What innovative solutions can you think of to reduce diesel emissions without significantly raising costs for consumers?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

How do school bus emissions in your area affect your thoughts on diesel emission standards and children's health?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

In your experience, how well do you think local businesses would adapt to stricter diesel emissions standards?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

How does the debate on diesel emissions standards reflect broader societal values about the environment and economy?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

What personal steps, if any, would you be willing to take to contribute to the reduction of harmful emissions, and why?

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…4mos4MO

Hegseth Out, DeSantis In? Trump Rethinks Defense Pick

President-elect Donald Trump is considering Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis as a possible replacement for Pete Hegseth, his pick to run the Pentagon, according to people familiar with the discussions, amid Republican senators’ concerns over mounting allegations about the former Fox News host’s personal life.Picking DeSantis, a 2024 GOP primary rival for the presidency, would amount to a stunning turn for Trump. But he would also find in the governor a well-known conservative with a service record who shares Trump’s—and Hegseth’s—view on culling what they see as “woke” policies in the military.Trump allies increasingly think Hegseth might not survive further scrutiny, according to people close to the president-elect’s team, which considers the next 48 hours to be crucial to his fate.DeSantis, who served as a Navy lawyer in Iraq and the Guantanamo Bay detention facility, was on an earlier list of potential defense-secretary candidates that transition officials presented to the president. Trump ultimately went with Hegseth. But as Hegseth’s nomination has faltered, that list has been revived and DeSantis is again among the choices Trump is considering, the people said.The discussions are in their early stages, one of the people said, adding that Trump has floated DeSantis’s name in casual conversations with guests at Mar-a-Lago, his private Florida club.Trump could decide not to choose DeSantis and select another replacement, if Hegseth’s nomination falls apart, the people said. Another potential defense-secretary candidate who has been discussed by Trump allies, according to people familiar with the matter, is Elbridge Colby, a former Pentagon official and ally of Vice President-elect JD Vance. Trump is also considering Sen. Joni Ernst (R., Iowa) for the job, some of the people said.DeSantis was once seen as an acolyte of Trump but his decision to challenge the former president in the 2024 GOP primary began a conflict between them, with Trump casting DeSantis as disloyal. Trump easily prevailed in the primary and friends of the two have worked to repair the relationship.

▲  279 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…4mos4MO

Border Bombshell: 8 Million New Arrivals Under Biden

The immigration surge of the past few years has been the largest in U.S. history, surpassing the great immigration boom of the late 1800s and early 1900s, according to a New York Times analysis of government data.Annual net migration — the number of people coming to the country minus the number leaving — averaged 2.4 million people from 2021 to 2023, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Total net migration during the Biden administration is likely to exceed eight million people.That’s a faster pace of arrivals than during any other period on record, including the peak years of Ellis Island traffic, when millions of Europeans came to the United States. Even after taking into account today’s larger U.S. population, the recent surge is the most rapid since at least 1850.The numbers in the Times analysis include both legal and illegal immigration. About 60 percent of immigrants who have entered the country since 2021 have done so without legal authorization, according to a Goldman Sachs report based on government data.The combined increases of legal and illegal immigration have caused the share of the U.S. population born in another country to reach a new high, 15.2 percent in 2023, up from 13.6 percent in 2020. The previous high was 14.8 percent, in 1890.Several factors caused the surge, starting with President Biden’s welcoming immigration policy during his first three years in office. Offended by Donald J. Trump’s harsh policies — including the separation of families at the border — Mr. Biden and other Democrats promised a different approach. “We’re a nation that says, ‘If you want to flee, and you’re fleeing oppression, you should come,’” Mr. Biden said during his 2020 presidential campaign.After taking office, his administration loosened the rules on asylum and other immigration policies, making it easier for people to enter the United States. Some have received temporary legal status while their cases wend through backlogged immigration courts. Others have remained without legal permission.

▲  1512 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…3mos3MO

Defense Bill Blocks Transgender Care To Minors

The Senate on Wednesday gave final approval to a defense policy bill directing $895 billion toward the Pentagon and other military activities, moving over the objections of some Democrats who opposed a provision added late in the negotiations that would deny coverage for transgender health procedures for minors.The 85-to-14 vote, coming a week after a divided House passed the same measure, cleared the bill for President Biden’s signature.Most Republicans and many Democrats supported the measure, which provides a 14.5 percent pay raise to junior enlisted service members and a 4.5 percent pay raise for all other service members. It also expands access to meal assistance, housing and child care programs that benefit those in uniform.But several Democrats withheld their backing in protest of a provision preventing TRICARE, the military’s health care plan for service members, from covering “medical interventions for the treatment of gender dysphoria that could result in sterilization” for children under 18.The language, which would affect the gender-transitioning children of service members, was recently added to the measure at the insistence of Speaker Mike Johnson, Republican of Louisiana, who refused to bring a defense bill to the House floor without it, according to aides familiar with the negotiations.Twenty-one Democrats, led by Senator Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin, proposed an amendment to strip the provision from the bill, but the matter was never brought to a vote. Several of them took to the floor on Tuesday to lodge their objections.“It’s flat-out wrong to put this provision in this bill and take away a service member’s freedom to make that decision for their families,” Ms. Baldwin said, estimating that the provision could negatively affect as many as 6,000 to 7,000 military families.

▲  2019 replies5 agree1 disagree6