Full accessibility ensures that public transportation accommodates people with disabilities by providing necessary facilities and services. Proponents argue that it ensures equal access, promotes independence for people with disabilities, and complies with disability rights. Opponents argue that it can be costly to implement and maintain and may require significant modifications to existing systems.
@9ZXDXJQ2wks2W
I don't think they should be fully accessible but I do think the price should be decreased for those with disabilities.
@9ZVPFDR3wks3W
Maybe, to an extent where it doesnt harm the rapid construction of public transportation
@9ZMZ74WConservative4wks4W
Yes but it can't happen all at once gradually get more accessable
Yes, and increase penalties for disability discrimination
@9WHRDPN2mos2MO
yes but define fully accessible, the gov can't give personalized transport to everyone
@9WGGM9M2mos2MO
yes but it is under the decision of the local government not the state or federal
@9TS28Y83mos3MO
Government should find a balance that is the most economical for assisting people with disabilities get to where they need to go, whether that is through upgrading of a public system, adding accessibility to existing infrastructure, or building unique infrastructure.
@9RZPX674mos4MO
to a certain point, taxpayer funded anything should be accessible to those who actually pay taxes
@9RCJ67TNew Democratic5mos5MO
Not require, but provide incentives for municipalities that do
@9P8NRFMNew Democratic 6mos6MO
Yes, and transportation systems that are not as easily accessible to disabled individuals should be renovated or if need be, replaced so that they able to provide appropriate accessibility for both people with disabilities and without disabilities.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
