Proponents argue that it would preserve cultural heritage and appeal to those who value traditional designs. Opponents argue that it would stifle innovation and limit the design freedom of car manufacturers.
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
@9SJL3X7Conservative 2yrs2Y
There is no reason to regulate the design of automobiles as it would hamper the development of the industry, which supplies thousands of jobs in Canada. There is a reason cars look wildly different from 1980 to 2024, and they will likely to continue to develop to become even safer and more reliable as that is what the market demands. Overregulation hampers Innovation
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
@9SJL3X7Conservative 2yrs2Y
There is no reason to regulate the design of automobiles as it would hamper the development of the industry, which supplies thousands of jobs in Canada. There is a reason cars look wildly different from 1980 to 2024, and they will likely to continue to develop to become even safer and more reliable as that is what the market demands.
@B2ZJH9G1yr1Y
@B2Y4YCBConservative1yr1Y
@B2TWT9HConservative1yr1Y
@B2DQ5HF1yr1Y
Yes, that means internal combustion engines. Stop telling us that you will force us to buy electric cars by 2035, how are you going to provide the infrastructure with our climate? Imagine providing street chargers to all the people that live in places with no driveways like Verdun, it's insane. Plus, I don't think the technology is going to be sufficient for snow clearing and god forbid we have another ice storm that knocks out electricity for weeks. Politicians who say we should all have electric cars by 2035 need to be thrown out of parliament.
@9ZXWXP21yr1Y
@9WYDMSD2yrs2Y
@B3PTXTY1yr1Y
@B3CPZL71yr1Y
@9VCP7622yrs2Y
@9SLJBJV2yrs2Y
@9RZPX672yrs2Y
@9RQNPMR2yrs2Y
@9P8NRFMNew Democratic 2yrs2Y
@9ZK3JNS2yrs2Y
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.