Should the government fund research into genetic engineering for disease prevention and treatment?

No, we should not open the pandora's box to modifying DNA which can have harmful social implications in the future

It's too diverse of a question to be filtered into a yes or no. Science has the change to have a negative impact

I would say yes to some extent as long as it's for a preventional reason like for instance preventing a deadly disease that affects the whole society not on just a handful on people..

No, but in the future, if diseases like monkey pox was to reach a covid 19 level of concern, then I would want that a top priority.

no, that is nothing but neo eugenics, a neo nazi school of thought, which our government and forefathers disagree with/ died protecting against

They have to be VERY VERY VERY careful when they do it but it can save lives and somebody is going to do it eventually so yes

The government research regarding health care is too corrupt and tied with psychopathic CDC and big Pharma.

It’s a thin line. Lots of rules would have to be set in place for using this kind of thing for me to feel comfortable about the idea.

It depends on what is being considered a disease. Considering homosexuality was classified as a disease not too long ago, it seems like too much of a blanket term to be in usage for genetic prevention.

well any government cannot be trusted at any level about medical research since we all know who finances all this...

Yes, make it as long as one’s life can ever last. A democracy to quality humans leads to a greater future of humanity in Canada’s society.

We should ask more ethical questions before going full steak ahead. Ask more philosophical and ethical questions

Yes, but only if they companies provide yearly breakdowns of where the funds are going. After 5 years if they don't provide any (proven) improvements, funding stops.

No, I don’t want the government funding things, but genetic engineering is cool and fun. Plus, who knows? Maybe we get a superhero out of it!

This could be used similarly to eugenics and so I'd like to hear the opinions of the disabled people it could effect before saying "yes."

yes, as long as it's done safely and ethically (willing volunteers, list of possible side effects, etc.)

Yes and the government should reap the profits from its investment as do all companies and turn those profits to the public purse for the public good. It is time that governments stop supporting private industry raping all the financial benefits will the public assumes all the liabilities for such ve turns.

Children with chronic diseass cause by no fault of their own deserve this to provide them a healthier future. Some disease is self inflicted with poor lifestyle choices and should not be eligible for this.

Yes, I think that government should consider funding for genetic engineering for disease prevention and treatment, as well as offer private Pharma companies incentives to both produce and do research in Canada.

As 'survival of the fittest' does not exist for the humans since we will always care and have compassion for human life, our gene pool will continue to pass down genetic defects. We need a way to fix our defects which will reduce the escalating strain on our health care system.

Yes, as long as it is used to heal, cure and prevent diseases and illnesses, not for things like you see on t.v. where someone ends up deformed like with 3 arms or a big blob.

Yes, but the government should absolutely investigate and analyze the genetic engineering processes in order to prevent a wide range of potential complications and mutations that may lead to deadly events. ( ex: neurological problems, epidemics, etc)

If the genetic engineering ONLY effects disease's and treatment plans without causing harm to the body then yes.

Yes, without full payment. You show that you're making significant advances with the proof to back it up or payments end.

No, we cannot afford to direct our funding to such an expensive project exspecially due to the fact that this is new and would take a long time and a lot of money that could be used for anything along the lines of community buildings and schools and hospitals where needed.

I support genetic testing for the purpose of empowering patients to make decisions better-informed decisions regarding their health and bodily autonomy. I wouldn't support genetic engineering without very strong, robust, and properly communicated safeguards against unethical practices and eugenics.

I think there’s a science answer to this and there’s a humanity answer to this… I don’t know which one to give.

No, they should fund more research in preventative medicines like stress management, environmental toxins and nutrition.

Yes, however as long as the labs the genetic engineering is occurring are monitored to ensure safety and sanitization.

yes, but there should be a requirement to have a way to reverse or neutralize any genetic engineering in case there are harmful unexpected outcomes

Yes, but there should be a requirement for some kind of 'reversal' or 'neutralization' for the treatment in case there are unexpected results

Yes but with appropriate safeguarding to protect individuals and their genetic makeup and ensure there is no negatives with having genetic material available to insurance companies.

Only if they are willing to commit money to social programs that keep unhealthy people housed and cared for. Just because you treat a disease and prolong life doesn’t mean the quality of life is great.

Maybe a little bit for more serious diseases, but everything must be done ethically, so it might be better if it was done privately. Still ethically.

There are better things to focus on than creating better genetics for the future and should focus on the now

Under strict and unbiased supervision, with plenty of long-term testing and full knowledge of any potentially harmful side effects.

I believe this should be done for things like cancer, Parkinson’s, and other similar diseases that gradually become more prevalent and limits cognitive abilities as you age. But it is a slippery slope into eugenics.

Yes, but only to treat and prevent diseases, not to genetically engineer people or lean towards eugenics.

Yes, but not used to alter babies under any circumstance. Only adults should be allowed access to genetic alteration

Yes as long as they don’t allow changes to an embryo.. so the change only affects an already born person.

yes but only to treat and prevent diseases but not to genetically engineer people for any other reason

Yes, as long as the advancements are thoroughly tested and verified to be free of long term negative side effects

To the highest degree, this is an extremely important issue with keeping people alive and preventing possible biological warfare.

Yes, but how will this affect the economy? And how will the government respond to something like this?

Yes, but it should be strictly reserved to medicinal use and exclude all meddling in reproduction and human cloning

Only for specific diseases such as alzheimers, dementia, etc. i would not support funding research into getting rid of people with autism or down syndrome.

Yes, but only if The research organization takes the best interests of the country into account And is unbiased

I beleive we should look into prevention of diesese and treatments involved in that but not so much genetic engineering.

yeah but private companies should do it themselves. The U.S.A. has the best record for eradicating diseases because they have the private money to do so.

It depends on the circumstances and their should people ensuring everyone is making good decisions and not starting new problems

Yes But But Only If The Results From The Genetic Engineering Research Are For Everyone To Equally Access Regardless Of Income Level

as long as they can be held accountable with fail safes put into place as it is a slippery slope into eugenics territory

Yes, we should fund more research. But the government should watch over the research. To ensure it is happening ethically

This question is vague. Genetic engineering for disease prevention and treatment is different in terms of whether it’s done on humans, crops or food.

Yes, Excepting that our government correctly uses peer reviewed research that identifies diseases and the likes.

I believe it is important, however, there are other pressing matters that I think the government should invest more money in.

Would you support genetic engineering if it were only used for medical purposes, or does that still raise concerns for you?

Is it more dangerous for us to not explore the benefits of genetic engineering, or to take the risk of using it without fully understanding the consequences?

How might society change if everyone could eliminate health risks or enhance abilities using genetic engineering?

Would you want to know if your DNA had been engineered, or do you think the results matter more than the process?

Do you think altering genes to eliminate diseases crosses an ethical line, or is it just a natural progression of science?

How would you feel if genetic engineering could allow you to choose certain traits in your future children?

This should be a part of the healthcare budget. Private companies should be allowed to do this as well

Is there a trait or characteristic you would want to change about yourself if genetic modification were available?

Yes but there have to be strict regulations to ensure that genetic engineering is ethical and won't be used to intentionally harm groups of people or generations

What fears come to mind when you think about modifying the DNA of living organisms, and are those fears valid?

Should all people have equal access to genetic engineering, or is it okay if only those who can afford it use it?

How do you think genetically modified humans would be treated in society—is it more likely to bring equality or division?