This considers the use of AI algorithms to assist in making decisions such as sentencing, parole, and law enforcement. Proponents argue that it can improve efficiency and reduce human biases. Opponents argue that it may perpetuate existing biases and lacks accountability.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Province/Territory:
@9YWJYJ62wks2W
Yes, but the accuracy of AI should be improved beforehand.
@9YMQ7FQ2wks2W
Both AI and a human should make two separate decisions then compare.
@9VLZQZ21mo1MO
Should be used to help decide but not ultimately decide.
@9VDFZ6FConservative2mos2MO
No, a human with feelings and emotions should be able to make decisions that drastically affect lives
No, AI is based on Human intellect and therfore is Progamed to be biased based on the human programer
@9V3BFHY2mos2MO
Abolish ai on a global scale because it takes over others jobs
@9TVPNXW2mos2MO
as long as the defendant and prosecution is okay with it
@9TLDMJL2mos2MO
No, AI does not understand emotions and consequences. It would not properly be able to assess the weight of these decisions to the community.
@9SLJBJV3mos3MO
Yes…it would take the human error factor/emotion out of sentencing and provide more consistency. Criminal justice currently favours the criminals rights and sentencing needs to consider and benefit the victims. It needs to be more than just a “legal system”
@9RRJ6D74mos4MO
Yes, but only if the technology is proven to have extremely high accuracy (99%+)
@9RPPNG74mos4MO
Yes, but it ought to be used to supplement the findings of the courts and juries.
@9RCXLPV4mos4MO
It should be used to detect evidence that was tampered with by ai.
@9RC3SBW4mos4MO
Not now since AI has been proven to invent case law, perhaps in the future but only as an adjunct.
@9RBY87R4mos4MO
No, AI could make suggestions but decisions should be made my humans
@9RBNFB74mos4MO
No, it will be assumed objective even though it will maintain our biases.
@Prosperitarian 4mos4MO
Yes, but only to offer solutions to decisions, not make them
@9MKYHZ76mos6MO
Yes, but only for minor infractions that would otherwise tie up the courts time for more major cases
@9P8NRFMNew Democratic 5mos5MO
Artificial Intelligence in its current state, is not true AI as it cannot make its own decisions and reasoning in an independent or unbiased manner. Current AI models heavily rely on information which is/was produced by various human scholars- of whom are experts in their qualified field(s) . Therefore, AI is not an appropriate overseer within legal/criminal fields.
@9NHHZDS 6mos6MO
AI can be used as a tool to help assist in making decisions, however, should not be used as the sole decision maker.
@9ZNXMHS2 days2D
Yes, assuming massive human oversight and the AI having to explain each part of its thought process and how it reached a conclusion.
@9ZNZZY82 days2D
Yes, but it should not be the main source of judicial decisions. Rather, it should be used to ensure consistent and uniform results based on case law and common law precedence.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
