This considers the use of AI algorithms to assist in making decisions such as sentencing, parole, and law enforcement. Proponents argue that it can improve efficiency and reduce human biases. Opponents argue that it may perpetuate existing biases and lacks accountability.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Province/Territory:
@9TLDMJL3mos3MO
No, AI does not understand emotions and consequences. It would not properly be able to assess the weight of these decisions to the community.
@9RCXLPV5mos5MO
It should be used to detect evidence that was tampered with by ai.
@9RC3SBW5mos5MO
Not now since AI has been proven to invent case law, perhaps in the future but only as an adjunct.
@9RBY87R5mos5MO
No, AI could make suggestions but decisions should be made my humans
@9RBNFB75mos5MO
No, it will be assumed objective even though it will maintain our biases.
@Prosperitarian 5mos5MO
Yes, but only to offer solutions to decisions, not make them
@9MKYHZ77mos7MO
Yes, but only for minor infractions that would otherwise tie up the courts time for more major cases
@9ZNZZY81mo1MO
Yes, but it should not be the main source of judicial decisions. Rather, it should be used to ensure consistent and uniform results based on case law and common law precedence.
@9ZNXMHS1mo1MO
Yes, assuming massive human oversight and the AI having to explain each part of its thought process and how it reached a conclusion.
@9YWJYJ61mo1MO
Yes, but the accuracy of AI should be improved beforehand.
@9YMQ7FQ1mo1MO
Both AI and a human should make two separate decisions then compare.
@9VLZQZ22mos2MO
Should be used to help decide but not ultimately decide.
@9VDFZ6FConservative3mos3MO
No, a human with feelings and emotions should be able to make decisions that drastically affect lives
No, AI is based on Human intellect and therfore is Progamed to be biased based on the human programer
@9V3BFHY3mos3MO
Abolish ai on a global scale because it takes over others jobs
@9TVPNXW3mos3MO
as long as the defendant and prosecution is okay with it
@9SLJBJV4mos4MO
Yes…it would take the human error factor/emotion out of sentencing and provide more consistency. Criminal justice currently favours the criminals rights and sentencing needs to consider and benefit the victims. It needs to be more than just a “legal system”
@9RRJ6D75mos5MO
Yes, but only if the technology is proven to have extremely high accuracy (99%+)
@9RPPNG75mos5MO
Yes, but it ought to be used to supplement the findings of the courts and juries.
@9P8NRFMNew Democratic 6mos6MO
Artificial Intelligence in its current state, is not true AI as it cannot make its own decisions and reasoning in an independent or unbiased manner. Current AI models heavily rely on information which is/was produced by various human scholars- of whom are experts in their qualified field(s) . Therefore, AI is not an appropriate overseer within legal/criminal fields.
@9NHHZDS 7mos7MO
AI can be used as a tool to help assist in making decisions, however, should not be used as the sole decision maker.
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
