Try the political quiz

0 Reply

 @9F6VHWJfrom Ontario answered…8mos8MO

 @8Z9R3TXRhinocerosfrom British Columbia answered…2yrs2Y

Both privatized and nationalized energy companies to keep the sector competitive while allowing for Canadian control of national resources.

 @9K58RGLfrom Yukon Territory answered…2mos2MO

Both, this should be a joint effort between the private and national sectors. The private sector needs to be strongly monitored and regulated, the national should ensure minimum well-being of citizens as a priority. At no point should a foreign party be in control of either sector.

 @9JZV4G6Conservativefrom Ontario answered…2mos2MO

No one is reducing my cost. The government claims they do, by something like $12 per month...but from the line to my door, costing me more than my actual hydro

 @9JQKZYTfrom New Brunswick answered…3mos3MO

Nationalize the energy sector while still allowing provinces to privatize temporarily to test new ideas

 @8WP78JHfrom Nova Scotia answered…3yrs3Y

Nationalize the grid / delivery of energy, privatize the creation and sale of energy

 @8VTL4WZfrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VL37XSfrom Alberta answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VKD4HPfrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

Privatize and allow individuals to produce, create and share energy without government permission.

 @8VK33KSfrom Quebec answered…3yrs3Y

Quebec hydro is our own ressource. We cannot be compared to the other provinces.

 @8VJ7CMYfrom Alberta answered…3yrs3Y

A combination of the two, as some energy like electricity should he nationalized.

 @8VH2TZWConservativefrom Quebec answered…3yrs3Y

It should operate under the same framework as NavCanada, a privately run, not for profit organization.

 @8VGFPVGfrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VDGRKTfrom Alberta answered…3yrs3Y

Have government owned energy while leaving the private sector to the market

 @8VDDFN9Liberalfrom Newfoundland answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VC4CHCfrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VB9PNWfrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

 @8V9S3DVfrom British Columbia answered…3yrs3Y

 @8V99PQMfrom British Columbia answered…3yrs3Y

 @8V99D27from British Columbia answered…3yrs3Y

There should be a mixture of both. At the federal level, there may be better opportunities for a nationalized company to acquire and operate resources across the country.

 @8V8LQD4New Democraticfrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

Privatize but provide incentive to companies who are providing clean renewable energy sources

 @8V8L4X3from British Columbia answered…3yrs3Y

Both, keep it balanced. Private sector can not be trusted to bring costs down. etc mergers, monopoly, price fixing

 @8V7LPJXfrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

Should be a joint effort where incentives are in place and those that stand out will be allowed to have joint efforts with government

 @8V6D9QDPeople’sfrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

Privatized with fewer regulations on production, but Nationalize distribution.

 @8V4LTS6Liberalfrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

 @8TZY7T9from Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

 @8TZHHMXfrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

 @8TZ65QCfrom Alberta answered…3yrs3Y

 @8TXR69Zfrom Manitoba answered…3yrs3Y

Nationalize, but ensure there's protections in place to prevent abuse

 @8TX7JTCConservativefrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

A half and half solution between privet and national... like a 60-40%

 @8TWZ76Tfrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

 @8TW2L7Bfrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

 @8TVGH7Lfrom Newfoundland answered…3yrs3Y

 @8TV9K36from British Columbia answered…3yrs3Y

 @8TRPMHXfrom Ontario answered…3yrs3Y

I am unsure at this moment/ don’t have enough information to formulate an opinion

 @8TRJDS3People’sfrom British Columbia answered…3yrs3Y

Privative while maintaining that beneficial ownership of energy firms must be over 50% Canadian.

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...