Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

78 Replies

 @9VWWVJ4from British Columbia  answered…6mos6MO

Send supplies rather than funds and give to the organizations that help the community rather than the govt. Help more innocent victims.

 @B48H5F7Liberalfrom Ontario  answered…5 days5D

Same spending but only to countries with no human rights violations. If we have to shuffle, then do that

 @B45T7J2from Ontario  answered…1wk1W

It highly depends on the situation and purpose. It should be decided by people or the members of parliament

 @B45SGLPfrom Quebec  answered…1wk1W

Our foreign aid spending should be tied to our current economic outlook and should be linked to our production and growth.

 @B43SXTX from Alberta  answered…2wks2W

Target aid more effectively to ensure funds go where they create real impact.

Encourage partnerships with Canadian businesses so aid leads to mutual economic benefits.

Increase oversight to reduce waste and corruption.

Shift focus toward sustainable development rather than just short-term relief.

 @B36LMM7from Ontario  answered…1mo1MO

Add foreign aid to individual people instead of the country and to poor countries example(African countries)

 @B35MPHBfrom Manitoba  answered…1mo1MO

Completely remove Aid to Israel until at least such a time as they stop the aggression on Syria, Lebanon, Palestine and go back to 1967 borders and recognize the country of Palestine.

 @B34Y5PHfrom Ontario  answered…1mo1MO

Decrease spending since the current spending on what we mask as “foreign aid” is only to secure economic or optical solidarity for neo imperialist forces in our country rather then a genuine willingness to help a needing nation.

 @B34VPRSfrom Ontario  answered…1mo1MO

I am satisfied with the current amount but we should be making sure the funds are not going to government's or organization's with human rights violations

 @B2YFDGWPeople’sfrom British Columbia  answered…2mos2MO

Give them enough that they can stand on there own, so you help them out a bit but not to much where you are sacrificing your own country massively, so you can also have allies and not be by yourself.

 @B2XQSX2from Alberta  answered…2mos2MO

depends on the situiation but i feel we should improve our country before we start trying to fix everyone else's

 @B2TMHZMfrom Alberta  answered…2mos2MO

Situation dependant. If we are in an okay state to lend a hand then I think we should. But I think we should put ourselves first.

 @B2ST4SYfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

I do not believe we have the means to increase foreign aid spending at this time as for decreasing this could be plossible if the money that is being taken from the foreign aid is actully put back into the contry and helping with our own issues such as homelessness and hungry as we ourselves have seen a huge increase in use of food banks even when working two jobs. we need to focuse on our own issues before we can properly assist our foreign aids and foreign allies.

 @B2RKXN3 from Alberta  answered…2mos2MO

Western countries, especially colonial powers, have historically exploited countries in the Global South, extracting resources and benefiting from systems that disadvantaged local populations. In many cases, this exploitation is ongoing—through trade deals, corporate interests, and international policies that often maintain inequality. So, when foreign aid is sent to countries like the Congo or other resource-rich nations, it can sometimes feel disingenuous, like a Band-Aid solution to deeper, systemic problems caused by Western countries' historical and ongoing actions. It is impo…  Read more

 @B2QB55Gfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

Stop funding violence/wars. Only provide aide for natural disasters, major accidents effecting the public (ie: walkerton), etc

 @B2PMG8Rfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

We need to prioritize where foreign aid is being sent and ensuring the livelihoods of people globally who face oppression and violence. In most areas, this would mean a decrease, but in others it would be an increase

 @B2LYYGRfrom Nova Scotia  answered…2mos2MO

As long as there is even one hungry Canadian, foreign spending should be eliminated. Take care of our people first. Only when there are no homeless Canadians and no hungry Canadians should foreign aid be considered.

 @B2L997Xfrom Nova Scotia  answered…2mos2MO

Increase, but only toward the purpose of creating a new system of relationships to decrease reliance on the American orbit.

 @B2L42TMfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

Decrease or suspended foreign aid until we can ensure that every Canadian and First Nations live have an adequate living standard

 @B2GVVDGfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

They should commit to spending more money on circumstances in our own backyard. First Nations, homelessness, mental health etc issues before spending more money on other countries. Fix our countries issues. Continue to give foreign aid but also help our country. Find a balance.

 @B2BNJSDfrom British Columbia  answered…3mos3MO

Send supplies rather funding's, and only send them in circumstances such as natural disasters and to countries that are not doing so well.

 @B2B2C59from Alberta  answered…3mos3MO

I think that the government should only send foreign aid to countries that really needs it due to terrorism and/or natural disasters

 @9ZQRBHRConservativefrom Ontario  answered…4mos4MO

Decrease until we reduce our national budget deficit, and Deng and to countries that harbor or promote terrorism.

 @9TXBP2YIndependentfrom British Columbia  answered…6mos6MO

Depends what aid is for. Case by case basis. Overall, should try to maintain or decrease if possible.

 @9T64K8RConservativefrom Ontario  answered…7mos7MO

Decrease, focus on reducing our national budget deficit, still give some humanitarian aid to warring countries and to help poorer nations.

 @9T3VJQSNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…7mos7MO

Canadian aid spending should prioritize security with regard to health and safety and fostering our global economy and be regulated so that it is not corporations who profit the most off of it. We should also not fund countries whose governments are committing human rights violations or that are destabilizing or exploiting other poorer countries.

 @9DDB3M2from Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

I fully support giving humanitarian aid to other countries. But I think the current government or Canada sometimes or regulary forget about its own native citizens (First Nations specifically)

I say this because I myself am a indigenous resident of Canada (First Nation/Native/Canadian/Native American) and seems like the current and past goverment parties never address the issues surrounding First Nation communities.

I dont have clean water, and Trudeau said he would fix the problem back in 2015 and its 2023 and I still got to filter and boil my water before use.

 @9D7X3DVfrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

Neither. However deny aid to countries that have human rights violation and/or harbor promote terrorism.

 @9D6GKQKfrom Nova Scotia  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9D67PGLfrom Georgia  answered…2yrs2Y

We should ultimately focus on solving our own domestic issues first before sending more money internationally.

 @9D4V5MCfrom New Brunswick  answered…2yrs2Y

Increase, but ensure we are funding our own agencies in Canada to support Canadians at the same level.

 @8NWXCW4from British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8NVW8LBfrom Nova Scotia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8G4QRC3Liberalfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8G296CFfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8F2KYGZfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

 @B3VQVNZfrom Alberta  answered…3wks3W

This should be used strategically to build strong partnerships and trust with current and new potential allies. Of course if there is an event where we can help recover or prevent a giant tragedy then I support increasing foreign aid. But some of the programs are ridiculous.

 @B3SNJ3QLiberalanswered…3wks3W

Yes, but strategically. Countries that harbor or promote terrorism should have all funding cut. Others with human rights violations should be given funding with requirements and milestones to rectify or improve such situations.

 @B3KFQF6from British Columbia  answered…4wks4W

I believe it should neither increase nor decrease; instead, it should stay the same. However, we should ensure it's going to the right places and people. For example, we should make sure our support to the DRC is going to its people instead of a warlord.

 @B3FXT7CLiberalfrom Manitoba  answered…1mo1MO

We need to support others who cannot support themselves because they are already under attack. We would want others to assist us if we were invaded.

 @B395RFRfrom Ontario  answered…1mo1MO

Cut off countries that abuse it abnd/or human rights, full stop. Also deny it to wealthy countries. And finally, attach strings; usage time limits and strict purposing.l, or it gets rescinded.

 @B34G8Z6from Ontario  answered…1mo1MO

Increase but only after we spend more to support citizens struggling with homelessness and the poor conditions of the natives

 @B33BTDHfrom Ontario  answered…1mo1MO

Decrease and focus on addressing issues in our communities such as poverty, homelessness, financial crisis, and food scarcity

 @B32CB8Kfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

Only with countries that are willing to spend on foreign nations as well for example NATO spending foreign aid with each other and other countries. If poorer countries when in a better situation don't spend as well we will decrease spending.

 @B27PJGNNew Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…3mos3MO

Yes, but again it depends on how much we can afford to allocate. Economic stability holds priority over humanitarian crises in my eyes.

 @B26DXZWfrom Quebec  answered…3mos3MO

Send supples rather than funds, and send to organizations who set out to positively help their country rather than to organizations or the government that violate human rights laws.

 @9ZZNB4NConservativefrom Ontario  answered…4mos4MO

Decrease or maintain where we are at, but also Canada should focus on helping both indigenous peoples living in bad conditions (i.e. give them clean drinking water), and help out Canadian citizens currently living on the streets.

 @9ZR6HQ9from Ontario  answered…4mos4MO

We should increase the foreign aid spending on countries that do not have any human rights but also most specifically what Canada should do is focus on the indigenous people who are still living in bad conditions.

 @9ZQV5PZfrom Ontario  answered…4mos4MO

Increase, but Canada should be more careful with how it coordinates that spending so as to achieve better outcomes

 @9YNQFHTNew Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…5mos5MO

Decrease for countries who harbor/promote terrorism, commit human rights violations. Spending should be more transparent

 @9WYDMSDfrom British Columbia  answered…5mos5MO

Eliminate until the debt is eliminated and only allow foreign aid spending in the form of building agriculture and industry and providing training completely with no expectation of getting it paid back. end all forms of monetary aid except in the case of liberation movements who fight against occupying forces that are not considered right wing or neo nazi extremist groups.

 @9WSS4QBfrom Ontario  answered…5mos5MO

Decrease

Decrease

Decrease considerably our foreign aid spending. You have 39+ million Canadians who depend on you to ensure their lives are worth living and contributing to Canada in a meaningful way.

Similar to the instructions one would receive while flying in a plane with family members. Make sure you put the oxygen mask on yourself first, before helping anyone else, even children. Because if you pass out before you finish helping them, you are both dead. I recognize my privilege in being born in a country free from war, but on average how much of that foreign aid actually reaches the people it is intended to help?

We have an incredible chunk of our population who cannot afford to buy a modest home. Help Canadians get back on their feet first. Then let them decide how they want to help people in need.

 @9WLCXG3from Alberta  answered…5mos5MO

I think immigrants should stay in theyre own country and not use people for there green card to emotionally abuse others or mentally and physically abuse themselevs in ways, STAY AWAY

 @9WKLBWBfrom British Columbia  answered…5mos5MO

Decrease until the debt is eliminated and only give aid to liberation movements fighting foreign occupation or in the case of environmental disasters.

 @9VD78J8Rhinocerosfrom British Columbia  answered…6mos6MO

Increase, but only for countries that have no human rights, when we are in a strong financial position to afford it.

 @9V9R5P2Conservativefrom Quebec  answered…6mos6MO

Canada should not only decrease the human aid spending on other countries, they should try to eliminate it fully because most of our foreign aid that is sent to other countries is not getting received or is being sold there. I was in Lebanon and I saw different foreign aid from all over the world being sold on the regular rather than helping people with it.

 @9V4JT2Cfrom Alberta  answered…6mos6MO

Decrease, until we are able to better help out own country. As our poor and homeless populations have increasing due to rising cost of living and nothing is being done with minimal supports

 @9TZYRSKfrom British Columbia  answered…6mos6MO

decrease, as our leaders tend to forget about us, the people, especially the indigenous peoples. I do agree with helping the people who need it, but we still need the support too.

 @9TB2T59from British Columbia  answered…7mos7MO

Only if an allied country such as Britain, France, America and other European NATO countries. But only if the conflict is happening within that country.

 @9T8K783from Alberta  answered…7mos7MO

depends, because Canada at the moment is supplying aid to Israel which i'm completely against, but with the right countries I think it should be increased.

 @9RDR257New Democraticfrom Manitoba  answered…8mos8MO

I believe that while we should still provide humanitarian support, the gov. should focus on Canadian issues, like the lack of clean water for native communities

 @9RCGFXGfrom Ontario  answered…8mos8MO

Increase, but only for countries not currently commiting human rights violations, war crimes, or violating Geneva conventions.

 @9QZCYDNfrom Ontario  answered…9mos9MO

Decrease giving money to countries that harbor or promote terrorism, or ones that have lots of human rights violations that cannot be trusted. Give that money to ones that don't fit that criteria. Probably keep the overall amount of aid the same.

 @9NK2RH9from Alberta  answered…10mos10MO

Foreign aid should not be given to UN organizations - UNRWA - which have/proven to foster hate, discrimination, and the normalization of antisemitism

 @9MW8Y2BConservativefrom Ontario  answered…10mos10MO

satisfied with the current amount but it should be stopped if the country violates human rights audaciously.

 @9LL92B4from Ontario  answered…12mos12MO

it depends on how much their receiving because they could also give to the homeless or people that need it

 @9KSKML3from Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

Maintain foreign aid to countries that have been impacted by Canada's Colonial Legacy but allow locals to determine allocation and encourage community participation

 @9KNP36Ffrom Saskatchewan  answered…1yr1Y

Increase for countries that share our interests and values, and decrease/stop aid to countries that do not need the aid or don't share our values/are committing human rights violations

 @9K6M454from Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

there is a good portion of this money being sent to somewhere else for goods, but why need it for stuff that doesn't effect us? completely dumb.

 @9K6HR9Kfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

In a land of this, we wouldn't do anything as much as else to the world, besides of what is of important need to the local economy.

 @9K58RGLfrom Yukon Territory  answered…1yr1Y

Maintain current levels while dramatically reducing any aid that goes to countries that do not support Western ideals. Specifically no countries that support terrorism, how's large terrorist bodies like Gaza, or treat women and orphans, or gay people, like garbage.

 @9JWTCPTfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

Not another nickle to any ally without independant evaluation regarding ANY human right violations committed & EVERY instance of civilian casualties. Suspended aid can be released if all has be done in good faith and if approved exoect uncompromising compliance accountability

 @9JWMJCZ from Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

Well mostly we will aid only the country which is getting attacked first. We will not help the country which attacked first, we will help out when there's a natural disaster.

 @9HCP7QVfrom Alberta  answered…1yr1Y

Eliminate foreign aid altogether. If a govt has enough money to send out of country, is it only because either taxes are too high, funds are being misused, but most likely both.

 @9H64L5Tfrom British Columbia  answered…1yr1Y

Spend that money on helping our own citizens such as those caught in the drug epidemic, the homeless, or those struggling with debilitating mental illness or disease. Why does our government refuse to spend money on its own people but hand over millions (or even billions) to other countries that are dealing with problems. It’s absurd.

 @9GZYG4Jfrom Quebec  answered…1yr1Y

Decrease, and deny aid to countries that harbor and/or promote terrorism, commit crime against children and/or crime against humanity.

 @9GML2K3Liberalfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

I am satisfied with the currrent amount but decrease aid to countries that harbor or promote terrorism

 @9FT46P4from Manitoba  answered…1yr1Y

I think we should focus on our own foreign aid spending, how much we need to decrease/increase it, before we look into decreasing or increasing other foreign countries aids.

 @9FKWVLVfrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

Same amount, but build procedures to ensure that the money is going to bettering the nations economy for all and prevent foreign aid spending going to government officials.

 @9FKT7BYfrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

I think it should decrease a little because they should spend a lot of money to make sure that there are no more people who are addicted to drugs because they can be dangerius to children and other people

 @9FKMM2Tfrom Saskatchewan  answered…2yrs2Y

It should not be increased anymore, keep it at the same level and allow inflation to decrease the impact.

 @9FKML6Ffrom Saskatchewan  answered…2yrs2Y

Our spending should be connected to how much aid the foreign location needs

 @9FJS26Vfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9FGH4X8answered…2yrs2Y

It should be decreased. your giving all the money to Ukraine while Canada is burning on both coast lines

 @9FDNLRLNew Democraticfrom Manitoba  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9FBWHFZfrom Alberta  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9F84JWNfrom British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9F7JQGCfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

The government should support those countries by empowering them to invest within the economies and growth of relevant sectors other than just offering aid

 @9F2XS9Mfrom British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

I believe that it should be increased for countries that have no human rights violations, nevertheless, Canadians should be helped first. There is far too much going on in our country that the government is neglecting and instead they are using their energy to support rather useless things. Canadians are suffering more then ever, and our so called "democratic" system is not listening to our voices.

 @9F2RVFCfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9F2HR8Qfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9DYV2PRfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9DFZ8V2from British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

If in the interest of protecting democracy then yes , such as supporting Ukraine