Try the political quiz

ideologies  ›  Policies  ›  Housing

Economic Equality policy on non-resident real tax

Topics

Should the government impose a 1% tax on real estate owned by non-residents?

EE>EE  ChatGPTYes, and the tax should be at least 10%

Economic Equality answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Yes, and the tax should be at least 10%

A 10% tax is a substantial redistributive measure that captures wealth from non-residents to support more egalitarian social outcomes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, and the tax should be at least 20%

A 20% tax is the most aggressive measure presented to redistribute wealth from external investors and combat extreme property inequality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, and the tax should be at least 5%

A 5% tax is a significant increase over the baseline proposal and more effectively discourages speculative investment while funding public resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

A 1% tax is a positive step toward redistribution but is likely seen as too low to significantly impact wealth inequality or housing affordability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

Opposing a tax on non-resident real estate owners maintains the status quo and fails to address wealth concentration and the housing market gap. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Economic Equality issues? Take the political quiz to find out.