다음은 이 유권자의 답변과 비교한 귀하의 답변입니다.
국내 정채 › 무장 교사
9>9 개인 답변No. Teachers should not be allowed to carry guns at school. It would lead to accidental shootings schools need trained security guards and students need quality access to mental health care to help prevent school shootings. |
사회적 › 낙태
9>9 개인 답변Abortion is an option that should be available. It should be strongly discouraged past 5 months. Abortion should be considered health care. Women who receive abortions should have free access to therapy. Banning abortion will harm women and children. Abortion is not something anyone is happy about. Abortion is sad but there are valid reasons for abortion. There should be free child care, more government funding for mental health services, paid parental leave for 2 years, new mother resorts like in South Korea and just anything that would make being a parent less stressful to help reduce abortion. |
국내 정채 › 정부의 민간인 감청
9>9 개인 답변No, this is a severe violation of privacy. Emails, messages and phone calls should be private. Privacy is a fundamental right and it is not the government's business what Canadians are talking about on call, email or messages. National security is an excuse the government shouldn't be allowed to monitor it's citizens regardless. |
보건 › 정신 건강
9>9 개인 답변Therapy and counseling should be free . A person cannot be physically healthy if they are mentally ill. Mental health care should be included in universal health care. We need to be researching mental illness more and give more funding so people who are in need get quality therapy. Diagnosing mental disorders should be free as well. |
보건 › 처방약
9>9 개인 답변Prescription drugs should be free. It's not fair some people risk their lives because they cannot afford medication. Access to medicine should be a fundamental right. |
사회적 › 동성애자 혼인
9>9 개인 답변Same sex marriage is morally equivalent to opposite sex marriage. It's none of the government business the gender of a couple getting married. I support marriage. Marriage can be between any two consenting adults, a man and a man, a woman and a woman , a man and a woman, a genderfluid and a woman, a enby and a man. Not allowing queer marriage is discriminatory. |
사회적 › 성적소수자 입양 권리
9>9 개인 답변The gender of the parents adopting shouldn't matter. Single parents should be allowed to adopt to. Gay/ lesbian couples are just as good as parents as a man and woman. What matters is the child has a secure, stable and happy home. |
외교 정책 › 의무 병역
9>9 개인 답변No but is a good way for NEETS to get an education and training. |
보건 › 정신 건강 기금
9>9 개인 답변Spend more money on mental health resources and programs. |
경제 › 세금
9>9 개인 답변Lower taxes for everyone but prevent loop holes for big Corporations. |
교육 › 대학 등록금
9>9 개인 답변Tuition should be free. Higher education is not a luxury. It should be a fundamental right. It is not far that poor people cannot afford to go to university and make less money because higher paying jobs require more training and education. |
환경 › 환경 규제
9>9 개인 답변There should be pushes for all companies to reduce carbon emissions and more alternatives for green and sustainable energy. |
사회적 › 성별 전환
9>9 개인 답변With the guidance of health care professionals and therapists they should allowed to. Every case is different. Some trans kids are at high risk of suicide without medical affirmation and others can wait. This is not a yes/ no situation. The experience of trans kids vary greatly. |
국내 정채 › 총기 규제
9>9 개인 답변Guns should be for hunting and sport. People who buy guns should go through mental health testing to make sure they are stable and not at risk of going crazy. It would be unconstitutional to ban guns. Everyone who is mentally sound should be able to own a gun. Guns should be primarily for hunting or sport though. |
보건 › 의료 자금 지원
9>9 개인 답변The federal government should be spending more on health care and research on Cancer and other diseases. The health care industry in Canada needs a lot more work put into it. |
사회적 › 연설을 증오
9>9 개인 답변No, hate speech is harmful and discriminatory and should not be protected free speech should cover ability to criticize the government that's it. |
사회적 › 안락사
9>9 개인 답변It's their life and anyone should be able to choose when to die if they want. Killing yourself is valid. Living your life out is also valid. Terminally ill people shouldn't have to suffer a slow painful death if they don't want to. They're gonna die anyways might as well make it quick and painful if they want that. |
경제 › 최저임금
9>9 개인 답변Every worker should make enough money for food, rent and housing. |
사회적 › 성 정체성
9>9 개인 답변Trans people should be free from discrimination, recieve government support and have access to medical care and resources. A person doesn't choose to be trans so they should be protected from discrimination. |
보건 › 단일 보험자 건강보험
9>9 개인 답변The federal government is the only one who should pay for health care. Everyone should get reliable fast health care no matter their income. No person should be able to use insurance to get priority health care. |
사회적 › 직장에서의 성 다양성
9>9 개인 답변More training should be given to women. Women deserve the training needed to get high level jobs. A company shouldn't be forced to hire women but they also shouldn't be able to not someone for being a woman. |
보건 › 치과 범위
9>9 개인 답변Bad teeth can kill you. Teeth are important to your health. Dental care should be covered in universal health care. |
이민 › 시민권 시험
9>9 개인 답변It's important new Canadian citizens have at least an elementary school knowledge on Canadian history and government. |
보건 › 의료 민영화
9>9 개인 답변Increase government funding. Offer free medical school to studious and passionate students to get more doctors. Make health care a spending priority. Every Canadian deserves world class healthcare regardless of their income. |
교육 › 유학생
9>9 개인 답변Everyone should have access to a free education and job training regardless of if they were born in Canada. |
외교 정책 › United Nations
9>9 개인 답변Canada should be involved in the UN, their peace keeping efforts help all of humanity. |
사회적 › 전투 여성
9>9 개인 답변A person of any gender should be allowed to join the military if they want. Not hiring based on gender is discrimination. |
경제 › 복지 관련 약물 검사
9>9 개인 답변No welfare users being drug users is a harmful stereotype. Welfare shouldn't involve drug testing.and be easier to get on. |
보건 › 보건
9>9 개인 답변Health care is a Federal responsibility. The health of Canadians is the Canadian governments responsibility. |
보건 › COVID 고용 건강 패스
9>9 개인 답변Vaccinations are safe and help reduce disease. Vaccinations have done good for society. A person shouldn't be forced to be vaccinated. |
경제 › 유니버설 아동 보호
9>9 개인 답변Government should provide free day care to all children. Daycare shouldn't be something parents have to pay out of pocket for. |
이민 › 이민자 동화
9>9 개인 답변English should be taught for free. English is useful for communication. It's important to have a shared language even if people speak different language at home. |
환경 › 플라스틱 제품 금지
9>9 개인 답변No, but there should be a push to make biodegradable and compostable single use plastics cheaper. It would be nice if we can eliminate plastic it just doesn't seem realistic. Biodegradable is better. |
환경 › 동물 실험
9>9 개인 답변Testing on animals is cruel and unethical. |
국내 정채 › 기본 자금 조달
9>9 개인 답변Indigenous people should have access to resources that embrace their culture. The ability to learn their mother tongue for free. Instead of giving them money give them access to mental health services, health care, healthy food and housing. Indigenous people need to be trained so they can make more money. |
국내 정채 › 소셜 미디어 규제
9>9 개인 답변No, the government should only be able to control hate speech and misinformation on government sites. Canadians deserve privacy online and it's none of the governments business what social media does. Canadians should be able to be punished for hate speech and misinformation they spread online by attending a re education program or diversity training. |
이민 › 무슬림 이민자 금지
9>9 개인 답변Banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional and the ones coming in need to be properly vetted. |
환경 › 키스톤 파이프 라인
9>9 개인 답변아니, 파이프 라인을 구축하고 타르 샌드의 모든 석유 생산을 종료하지 |
환경 › 수압파쇄 석유 시추
9>9 개인 답변No, this is unsustainable and wrecks havoc on the environment We need clean energy. |
사회적 › 트랜스젠더 운동 선수
9>9 개인 답변Transgender people should be allowed to compete in sports. Banning trans people from sports is discrimination. Policing bodies in sports hurts not only trans people but cis people |
환경 › 재생 에너지
9>9 개인 답변The government should be funding renewable and green energy. Sustainable energy is worth investigating time , effort and money into. |
사회적 › 히잡
9>9 개인 답변Niqab doesn't harm anyone. It's okay to wear a niqab anywhere. If you don't wanna show your face that's your decision. It should be respected. Niquabi shouldn't be treated as a threat. |
사회적 › 사형
9>9 개인 답변Death penalty is immoral. It's not okay to kill anyone even if they are a bad person. Death penalty is something that should be outlawed. Lots of innocent people end up killed in countries with death penalty. |
환경 › 노던 게이트웨이 파이프 라인
9>9 개인 답변아니, Enbridge 파이프 라인 설치의 빈약 한 역사를 가지고 |
국내 정채 › 의약품 정책
9>9 개인 답변Drug users need therapy , counselling and rehabilitation not harsh prison sentences. Addiction is a condition that impacts the mind body and soul and cannot be cured by harsh prison sentences. |
범죄 › 마약 밀매에 대한 처벌
9>9 개인 답변No, they should receive addictions counselling and rehab. Killing someone for drug dealing is not okay. |
범죄 › 개인 교도소
9>9 개인 답변Prisoners should be federally run. Feed prisoners healthy food, let them get exercise and access to mental health services and health care. Prisoners shouldn't be an industry to make money off of but help bring bad people back into society as good people. Of course some people cannot be changed and should just stay in prison forever. |
국내 정채 › 망 중립성
9>9 개인 답변It's really unfair if the bigger sites have a faster connection. There's too many monopolies online. The little guy shouldn't be at the disadvantage. A website should not be allowed to pay for optimal speed. Every site should have equal speed. |
국내 정채 › 통근 철도
9>9 개인 답변The government should invest in commuter urban rail transposition. Trains are a great alternative to using cars. There should be more options to get around in cities such as monorail, train, subway and what not. Cities shouldn't be built around cars it's dystopian. |
보건 › 안전 피난처
9>9 개인 답변More funding should be put into rehab and addiction counselling. Safe injection sites might reduce overdoses but people who attend those sites should be encouraged to get rehab for free. |
보건 › 마리화나
9>9 개인 답변It's none of my business what plant others smoke. If they wanna grow it and sell it they can. It's not harming anyone. |
경제 › 복지
9>9 개인 답변Make it easier to get on welfare Don't make people jump through many hoops to get welfare. |
범죄 › 경찰에 대한 환불
9>9 개인 답변Increase funding to police so they can receive conflict resolution and mental health training. Police should be able to handle every situation. Increase funding so they can become counselors too. Abolishing the police would be stupid more work has to be done to make police better. Police training should involve critical race theory. |
범죄 › 경찰 비무장화
9>9 개인 답변No, only services who are formally trained to use military grade equipment should use military equipment. |
선거 › 선거자금 조달
9>9 개인 답변아니오, 이런 종류의 기부는 단지 뇌물일 뿐입니다. |
선거 › 최소 투표연령
9>9 개인 답변Keep it at 18. Minors aren't informed enough on politics to vote. |
환경 › 유전자 변형 식품
9>9 개인 답변It allows for faster growth and therefore cheaper and more abundant foods. Seeds shouldn't be allowed to be patented and GMO foods should be labelled so buyers are informed. |
주택 › 외국인 소유 주택
9>9 개인 답변Houses in Canada should be for Canadians. Foreigners cannot just move to Canada and buy a house there's a housing shortage houses should be for Canadians. Only foreigners that can own a home should be 5+ year permanent residents. |
범죄 › 가석방 청문회
9>9 개인 답변If they've been well behaved prisoner and not at risk to kill again sure. |
선거 › 총리의 임기 제한
9>9 개인 답변Limit terms. Canadian leaders get dictator like when in power for too long. |
경제 › 노령 연금
9>9 개인 답변Retired elderly people should get enough money to live comfortably. |
주택 › 노숙자 야영지
9>9 개인 답변Homelessness people should be given a place to stay. It is not okay for anyone to live in the streets. Everyone deserves a safe home for free even if they can't work for health reasons. If a homeless person is forced to sleep in public on a bench they shouldn't be punished. It's not their fault they have no shelter. |
선거 › 외국인 투표권
9>9 개인 답변Everyone living in Canada should vote. Foreigners contribute lots to Canada so they should be able to vote. |
선거 › 정신 능력 테스트
9>9 개인 답변아니요, 정신 능력은 너무 주관적이며 테스트 프로세스가 남용될 수 있습니다. |
경제 › 경기 부양 대책
9>9 개인 답변The government should be making sure people who lost their jobs due to a recession get a basic income to pay for their food, water, electricity and shelter. Quick action needs to be taken to ensure the economy gets back on track but not at the cost of cutting government funding. |
이민 › 기술 이민자
9>9 개인 답변Maintain the current amount but give free education and job training to lessen the need for foreigner highly skilled workers in the future. |
국내 정채 › 국립 데이 케어
9>9 개인 답변Daycare should be free for every child. Children should have free access to preschool and day care. It's unfair to have parents pay money to have someone look after their child when they are forced to work to make ends meet. |
국내 정채 › 노동자의 파업
9>9 개인 답변Workers should be allowed to strike for whatever reason. If workers aren't satisfied with their working conditions, how much they are paid, company policy or however it may be they should be able to go on strike indefinitely until appropriate action is taken to meet their needs. |
경제 › 정부 지출
9>9 개인 답변Government officials should make less money. Politics should be for the greater good of society not because you're greedy and want lots of money. We should also reduce military spending. |
국내 정채 › 에너지 분야
9>9 개인 답변Nationalize the energy sector. Greedy private corporations shouldn't control the energy. Electricity should also be free to everyone but have a limit on how much you can use. Everyone should have electricity even if they cannot pay as long as they aren't a resource hog and it should be the federal government's responsibility. |
주택 › 저렴한 주택
9>9 개인 답변The government should fund more housing projects so low income, homeless people and even middle class people stuck renting have the ability to buy a cheap home. These homes should be tiny homes and use sustainable energy. Canada is short on housing so we should be spending way more money on building homes for people to stay. It would be great if they were sustainable and affordable and tiny houses are really cheap to make. |
사회적 › 교사 및 교직원 다양성 교육
9>9 개인 답변Teachers and school staff should receive diversity training so they do not pass biases and prejudice on to students. It's important teachers be informed on topics such as homophobia, transphobia, racism and xenophobia to help foster a welcoming classroom environment. Teachers shouldn't be allowed to spread hate speech in the classroom. |
주택 › 주택 구매자 인센티브
9>9 개인 답변The government should make it easier for low income people to buy a house. Owning a house shouldn't be a luxury for the rich. Low income people need help affording homes. |
주택 › 비거주 실질 세금
9>9 개인 답변Foreigner buyers shouldn't be allowed to make buying houses more expensive for Canadians. |
이민 › 이중 국적
9>9 개인 답변A person should be able to be a citizen of as many countries as they want. |
사회적 › 학생 다양성 교육
9>9 개인 답변Students should be taught about oppression and oppressors. Gender identity and critical race theory. Students should be taught respect LGBTQIA+ people, minorities and other POC. Diversity training will be helpfu in reducing bullying. It shouldn't be forced but strongly encouraged. |
교육 › 중등 교육
9>9 개인 답변Universities should be public and free to attend. University should be a federal responsibly. |
외교 정책 › 빌 C-51
9>9 개인 답변Only proven terrorists should be deported and monitored. Monitoring suspected terrorists and deporting them can lead to minorities being falsely targeted. |
국내 정채 › 국기 방화
9>9 개인 답변No, it's just a piece of fabric. The Canadian flag doesn't have to mean anything to anyone. To many people the Canadian flag is a symbol of oppression and a reminder of genocide. It's okay to burn the flag in protest of government. Burning the flag should be protected by free speech. Canadians shouldn't be forced to take care of a piece of fabric that doesn't necessarily mean anything to them. |
보건 › 세계 보건기구
9>9 개인 답변The world health organization is useful for everyone. Every country that should afford it should contribute. Canada can help fund important medical research on the international stage. |
선거 › 선거 개혁
9>9 개인 답변Canada should become a republic and use the electoral college like the United States. |
외교 정책 › 외국 원조
9>9 개인 답변Focus on the needs of Canadians first. If we cannot ensure all Canadians are free from discrimination, have health care, food, clean water we cannot be helping others. Make sure the needs of Canadians are met before helping others. Of course it would be nice it Canada can help everyone it's just not realistic. We should only help other countries who need it most. |
경제 › 역외 은행 거래
9>9 개인 답변No, scummy rich people do it to evade taxes. |
경제 › 소득 분할
9>9 개인 답변Less taxes means less of a burden for families. |
사회적 › 직원 다양성 교육
9>9 개인 답변It's none of the government's business how a private company trains staff but the government should diversity train it's government employees. And offer a free quality diversity training program to private businesses. With that said a private business shouldn't be able to refuse service to anyone based on race , gender or sexuality. |
경제 › 정부 연금
9>9 개인 답변Pensioners should get more money. Make it so they're able to live comfortably. Pensions should pay enough for all of elderly people's needs. |
이민 › 임시 외국인 근로자
9>9 개인 답변Train more Canadians and prioritize Canadians when hiring. Do more to address the worker shortage within Canada using Canadians but use foreign temporary workers if necessary. |
범죄 › 범죄자의 투표권
9>9 개인 답변Everyone should be able to vote. Criminals are citizens too and voting should be a right. |
보건 › 의학적 합의
9>9 개인 답변They should use their medical license and be punished. A doctor spreading medical misinformation jeopardizes the safety of patients. |
국내 정채 › 상원
9>9 개인 답변Abolish the Senate. The senate has no place in the government as they are not elected. It is wrong to have had picked appointed Senate. If the Senate has to exist the public should vote them in. |
국내 정채 › CBC 자금 조달
9>9 개인 답변Increase funding to public broadcasting. Invest in bi partisan public broadcasting so every Canadian has access to quality news. Every area should be required to have a public broadcasting station that works on radio and on TV. Every Canadian should be able to access the news and it should be non political and funded by the government. |
국내 정채 › 소셜 미디어의 정치 광고
9>9 개인 답변Canadians should not be targeted with political ads on social media. Any attempt to persuade Canadians into a political side should be frowned upon. Social media ad's shouldn't be political. It should be illegal to invest in social media ads if you are a political party but it's none of Canadian governments business what ad's social media show. |
외교 정책 › 군비
9>9 개인 답변I think war is disgusting and money should be spent to help keep peace. |
경제 › 연금 보험료
9>9 개인 답변네, 높은 보험료는 경제에 재투자 및 노인에 지급 자금을 정부의 책임을 줄이기 위해 사용될 수있다 |
범죄 › 교도소 과잉 수용
9>9 개인 답변Yes. And help them transition to life outside of prison with rehabilitation programs and volunteer work |
환경 › 전기차 충전소
9>9 개인 답변Invest in charging stations for electric videos. Make electric videos more affordable. |
교육 › 차터 스쿨
9>9 개인 답변No, education should be public. Every child and teenager should have access to free, quality public education. |
이민 › 보호 구역 도시
9>9 개인 답변Undocumented people shouldn't be punished and des deserve a place to live. |
환경 › 기업 보조금
9>9 개인 답변아니요, 인프라와 커뮤니티를 개선하여 회사를 유치하는 데 그 돈을 사용하십시오. |
국내 정채 › 긴 양식 인구 조사
9>9 개인 답변The census shouldn't be mandatory. The census should be optional for all canadians. A person shouldn't have to share any information they don't want with government. The census is helpful in understanding the country and its citizens. A long form census would be more helpful but short form would do. Privacy matters. |
교통 › 상업용 드론
9>9 개인 답변Depends on what the drones are used for . |
다음은 인기 있는 정치적 주제에 대해 이 유권자와 비교하는 방법입니다.
당신은 "안전"쪽으로 약간 편이 서서, 정부가 시민들의 안전을 보장하기 위해 모든 권한을 행사해야한다고 more often 믿는다는 것을 의미합니다. 이 테마는 당신에게 더 중요하다.
당신은 적당히 "정치적으로 부정확하다"고 말하면서, 우리 사회가 직접적이고 정직한 언어에 너무 민감 해지고 있다고 믿는다는 것을 의미합니다. 이 테마는 당신에게 더 중요하다.
당신은 "민족주의"쪽으로 약간 편이 서서, 우리 국민의 이익을 다른 사람들보다 우선시하는 정책을 more often 지지한다는 것을 의미합니다. 이 테마는 당신에게 어느 정도 중요하다.
당신은 "지방 분권화"쪽으로 약간 편향됩니다. 행정 권력과 의사 결정이 지역 차원에서 다루어 져야하며 지역 사회의 이익을 가장 잘 수행해야한다고 more often 믿습니다. 이 테마는 당신에게 어느 정도 중요하다.
당신은 자본주의와 민주주의 사회주의 문제에 대한 중도 주의자입니다. 이 테마는 당신에게 어느 정도 중요하다.
당신은 동화와 다문화주의에 관한 중도 주의자입니다. 이 테마는 당신에게 어느 정도 중요하다.
당신은 사회 경제적 평등을 증진시키는 정책을 지지한다는 의미에서 "좌익"쪽으로 적당히 편입니다. 이 테마는 당신에게 어느 정도 중요하다.
당신은 권위주의적이고 libertarian 문제에 중도입니다. 이 테마는 당신에게 어느 정도 중요하다.
정부 규제가 혁신과 경제적 번영을 저해한다는 사실을 very strongly 믿는다는 의미에서 "규제 완화"를 지향합니다. 이 테마는 당신에게 어느 정도 중요하다.
당신은 전통적이고 진보적 인 문제에 중도 주의자입니다. 이 테마는 당신에게 덜 중요하다.
당신은 인간 중심주의와 환경 문제에 중도 주의자입니다. 이 테마는 당신에게 덜 중요하다.
당신은 큰 정부와 작은 정부 문제에 중도입니다. 이 테마는 당신에게 덜 중요하다.
당신은 온건하게 "보호주의"쪽으로 기울어 져 있습니다. 이것은 세계화가 노동자의 안전, 보상, 환경 및 생활 수준에 해로운 것이라고 믿는다는 것을 의미합니다. 이 테마는 당신에게 덜 중요하다.
당신은 집산주의와 개인주의 이슈에 중도 주의자입니다. 이 테마는 당신에게 덜 중요하다.
당신은 힘들고 부드러운 문제에 중도입니다. 이 테마는 당신에게 덜 중요하다.
당신은 "다자주의"를 향한쪽으로 약간 기울어 져 있습니다. 이는 결정 결과에 영향을받을 수있는 모든 사람들의지지와 함께 정책 결정이 공동으로 이루어져야한다고 more often 믿는 것을 의미합니다. 이 테마는 당신에게 덜 중요하다.
당신은 제국주의와 고립주의 문제에 중도 주의자입니다. 이 테마는 당신에게 덜 중요하다.
당신은 "케인 지안"쪽으로 약간 기울어 져 있습니다. 이것은 정부가 경제 안정을 위해 경제 원조를 제공해야한다고 more often 믿는다는 의미입니다. 이 테마는 적어도 중요하다.
더 많은 중요한 순위에있는 13 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
더 많은 중요한 순위에있는 15 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
어느 정도는 중요 중요한 순위에있는 9 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
어느 정도는 중요 중요한 순위에있는 17 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
어느 정도는 중요 중요한 순위에있는 5 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
어느 정도는 중요 중요한 순위에있는 13 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
어느 정도는 중요 중요한 순위에있는 10 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
어느 정도는 중요 중요한 순위에있는 7 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
어느 정도는 중요 중요한 순위에있는 8 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
어느 정도는 중요 중요한 순위에있는 16 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
더 적은 중요한 순위에있는 5 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
더 적은 중요한 순위에있는 1 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
더 적은 중요한 순위에있는 3 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
다음은 전통적인 이념적 축에서 이 유권자와 비교하는 방법입니다.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. 판권 소유. 이 사이트를 사용하면 당사의 사용자 계약 및 개인 정보 보호 정책 에 동의하는 것으로 간주됩니다. iSideWith.com은 소매업체와의 제휴 파트너십의 일환으로 당사 사이트를 통해 구매한 제품에서 판매의 일부를 얻을 수 있습니다. iSideWith.com의 사전 서면 승인 없이는 이 사이트의 자료를 복제, 배포, 전송, 캐시 또는 기타 방식으로 사용할 수 없습니다.