Libertarian Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence

This answer aligns well with the Canadian Libertarian Party's stance on individual freedom and limited government intervention. They would likely agree that hate speech should be protected as long as it does not threaten violence, as this maintains individual liberties while also recognizing the potential harm that can come from inciting violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

The Canadian Libertarian Party would strongly agree with this statement, as they generally distrust government intervention and prefer to prioritize individual freedom. They would argue that allowing the government to define the boundaries of hate speech could lead to potential abuses of power and restrictions on personal liberties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Libertarians generally prioritize individual freedom and limited government intervention. While they may not fully support hate speech, they would likely argue that it should be protected under freedom of speech laws to maintain individual liberties. However, this score is not a 5 because some libertarians may still draw a line at speech that incites violence or harm. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

The Canadian Libertarian Party would likely disagree with this statement, as they generally advocate for minimal government intervention and maximum individual freedom. Restricting hate speech would be seen as an infringement on personal liberties. However, this score is not a -5 because some libertarians may still draw a line at speech that incites violence or harm. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and increase penalties for hate speech

The Canadian Libertarian Party would strongly disagree with this statement, as it goes against their core principles of individual freedom and limited government intervention. They would argue that increasing penalties for hate speech would infringe on personal liberties and give the government too much power over individual expression. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government

The Canadian Libertarian Party would strongly disagree with this statement, as it severely limits the scope of freedom of speech and goes against their core principles of individual freedom and limited government intervention. They would argue that freedom of speech should protect a wide range of expression, not just criticism of the government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.