@ISIDEWITHQuestionsimmigrationStarted 8yrs agoActive 2wks ago

Should immigrants be deported if they commit a serious crime?

In 2015 the U.S. House of Representatives introduced the Establishing Mandatory Minimums for Illegal Reentry Act of 2015 (Kate’s Law.) The law was introduced after San Francisco 32 year old San Francisco resident Kathryn Steinle was shot and killed by Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez on July 1, 2015. Lopez-Sanchez was an illegal immigrant from Mexico who had been deported on five separate occasions since 1991 and been charged with seven felony convictions. Since 1991 Lopez-Sanchez had been charged with seven felony convictions and deported five times by the U.S. Immigration and Naturaliza…  

Read more
+
Expand
+ Settings x  

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 2k L6M voters.

63%
Yes
37%
No
52%
Yes
23%
No
9%
Yes, as long as it is safe for them to return to their country
14%
No, only if they have entered the country illegally
2%
Yes, but after they have finished serving their sentence

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 2k L6M voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 2k L6M voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from L6M voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @8TJ4YV9from Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

If they have family in Canada, no, let them serve time in Canada.

 @8T8RK7Sfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

It doesn't matter to me which prison they are in

 @8SXBDSQfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

No, they should serve their sentence in Canada

 @8SCG5FRfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

If they are a canadian citizen then no. They should be treated like any other citizen.

 @8SYC4LCfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

If they have citizenship, they should serve their sentance as a Canadian in Canada.

 @8VHJHZ5from Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but after they have finished serving their sentence and its safe to return to their home countrey

 @9ZZFG54from Alberta  answered…2wks2W

If the crime was intentional and threatening or causing injury or death or grievous loss of property etc.

 @9ZZ37MKfrom Alberta  answered…2wks2W

Yes, regardless of if their country of origin is a country with a bad human rights history should of thought about that before committing a violent offence

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…1mo1MO

Billion-Dollar Bust: Kamala’s Campaign Drowns in Debt After Star-Studded Spending Spree

Kamala Harris's campaign ended with at least $20 million in debt, per two sources familiar. Harris raised over $1 billion and had $118 million in the bank as of Oct. 16.Rob Flaherty, this staffer said, is currently shopping around the Kamala fundraising email list to anyone who wants it to try to raise the money back. This includes other campaigns and outside groups.Flaherty is the deputy campaign manager and reports to Jen O’Malley Dillon.“Jen blew through a billion dollars in a few months and it was all Jen’s idea to do all the concerts.” — Kamala campaign adviser told meThis source added that O’Malley Dillon did these “concerts,” like Katy Perry, Lizzo, Eminem, Bruce Springsteen et cetera at the expense of “prioritizing and spending money on social media and other campaign priorities.”Apparently a group in Georgia had to lay off 100 people because they couldn’t pay them. It’s unclear at this time if the campaign PAID the talent to perform but the cost of production for the events was “immense.”What’s more, this Kamala campaign staffer said several people who were working for the Kamala Harris for President campaign are still awaiting several overdue payments they were promised for their work. IE, they didn’t pay the staff.“People didn’t like working with her. Many people on the campaign felt like we lost because Kamala wasn’t allowed to run her campaign. They were running Joe Biden’s campaign instead of a Kamala campaign. Obnoxious and very much a gate keeper and interfering with the vice president’s people who were trying to do their job.”

▲  2611 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…4wks4W

Donald Trump nominates Pam Bondi as the next Attorney General

Former President and 2024 Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has announced his intention to nominate former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi as the next Attorney General of the United States, should he reclaim the presidency in the upcoming election.Bondi, a prominent figure in Republican politics, served as Florida's Attorney General from 2011 to 2019. She gained national attention for her legal battles on issues such as health care reform, consumer protection, and opioid abuse litigation. Known for her steadfast support of Trump during his presidency, Bondi also served as a key adviser during his first impeachment trial, where she defended his administration against accusations of abuse of power.In a statement released by his campaign, Trump praised Bondi’s “unwavering commitment to justice” and her “track record of standing up for everyday Americans against the abuses of Washington’s elites.”“Pam Bondi has been a fearless advocate for the people, and she embodies the principles of fairness, accountability, and the rule of law that are sorely needed to restore trust in our justice system,” Trump said. “She is the right person to lead the Department of Justice into a new era of integrity and excellence.”While Bondi’s nomination has been met with applause from conservative circles, it has also reignited criticism from Democrats and ethics watchdogs. Her acceptance of a $25,000 donation from the Trump Foundation in 2013, which coincided with her decision not to pursue an investigation into Trump University, has drawn scrutiny in the past and resurfaced following the announcement.Democratic leaders have already voiced opposition, questioning Bondi’s ability to lead the Department of Justice independently. Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) called the nomination “a political power play” and urged a focus on “restoring integrity, not entrenching partisanship.”

▲  2317 replies