82% Yes |
14% No |
72% Yes |
12% No |
4% Yes, but only when a high cost threshold is exceeded |
2% No, we cannot afford to add this at the moment |
4% Yes, but only for low income families |
|
2% Yes, cover the overall prescription costs but have the patient pay the pharmacy dispensing costs |
See how support for each position on “Prescription Drugs” has changed over time for 1.6m Canada voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Prescription Drugs” has changed over time for 1.6m Canada voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Canada users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9LJGNWT 5 days5D
No, get private health care coverage, if you want. No coverage, no treatment unless charity of some sort voluntarily steps in. Private coverage options should become competitive but will also underwrite each applicant and possibly deny coverage in some circumstances. In that case, a public form may be needed but paid for by the insured.
@9GHTBSS6mos6MO
Yes but No, people could also be drug addicts so I still think you should pay for your medication however if you are not eligible to afford it then it should be covered.
@9G97MP96mos6MO
Ensure that patients will not become addicted, and also ensure that doctors or pharmacists are 100% certain that they are trying to help and not just make money.
@8VV2P573yrs3Y
Yes, but only for those who cannot afford it
@8VKFPCT3yrs3Y
Depends on what they are used to treat.
@8VK2MRY3yrs3Y
Low income does not mean sitting on welfare
Explore other topics that are important to Canada voters.