This question considers whether maintaining and repairing current infrastructure should take precedence over constructing new roads and bridges. Proponents argue that it ensures safety, extends the life of existing infrastructure, and is more cost-effective. Opponents argue that new infrastructure is needed to support growth and improve transportation networks.
71% Yes |
29% No |
71% Yes |
29% No |
See how support for each position on “Road Maintenance vs. New Infrastructure” has changed over time for 56 Canada voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Road Maintenance vs. New Infrastructure” has changed over time for 56 Canada voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Canada users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9P8NRFM 6 days6D
Many existing roads/railways are not always kept in the same condition as those in higher density/income cities. The construction of new roads/railways shouldn't be discouraged (if there was no existing road/railway in the given area to begin with) but the upkeep of existing roads/railways should be recognised and encouraged before the construction of a new road/railway.
@9N5BVB73wks3W
If the highway is functional and can transport large sums of people from region to region with minor roughups in the region, then it is not required. However, new infrastructure to new locations should be made in order to make commuting more functional.
@9MZ47BD 4wks4W
repair and maintenance should have a higher priority but it important to build new infrastructure where there is none
@9MW9BY2 4wks4W
They should do both work on the existing one and try to build new where required (only) to improve the transportation experience
Explore other topics that are important to Canada voters.
