+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 260 Christian Heritage voters.

28%
Yes
72%
No
26%
Yes
68%
No
1%
Yes, but only targeting criminal hotspots to protect vulnerable communities
2%
No, it sets a dangerous precedent for government control over citizens
1%
Yes, but only if it’s tightly regulated and used with transparency
1%
No, this would be too expensive to implement
1%
No, I trust the technology but not the humans that could misuse it

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 260 Christian Heritage voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 260 Christian Heritage voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Christian Heritage voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9QQG9Z8from Ontario  answered…6mos6MO

 @9P8NRFM from Alberta  answered…6mos6MO

Yes, but this should not be the only method of identification. For example, in order to participate in Canadian elections the voter must present at least two different forms of identification that contain the individual's name, date of birth, address, etc.

 @9NK2RH9from Alberta  answered…7mos7MO

 @9NGVW5Nfrom British Columbia  answered…7mos7MO

The seems like it would turn into a privacy thing where everyone would end up having their privacy violated

 @9MV4GBFfrom Ontario  answered…7mos7MO

I think they should do it but only for criminal detection software, like if someone commited a crime in the past, their face should be added to a list for detection and reconnasenice for criminal behavior

 @9MSXW7Rfrom Ontario  answered…7mos7MO

 @9XPF7TCanswered…2mos2MO

As long as the system can only recognize the faces of wanted criminals or missing persons and doesn't collect any facial data.

 @9WGXHQLfrom Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

They should accuse facial recognition for the roads where the lights are but they shouldn't have that if there's no lights and there's just houses.