Bridget Burns

Very strongly agree

Yes, but ensure it does not unfairly target diaspora communities

This matches the Greens’ usual approach: support transparency/anti-interference tools while explicitly guarding against stigmatizing diaspora communities and protecting civil liberties (a consistent theme in their justice/anti-racism positions). Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Greens generally support transparency and democratic safeguards, and have backed measures to address foreign interference, but tend to pair this with strong civil-liberties protections rather than an unqualified “yes.” Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, protect national sovereignty by aggressively exposing foreign interference

They would agree with protecting sovereignty and exposing interference, but the framing “aggressively” is less aligned with the Greens’ typical rights-focused, de-escalatory tone and preference for carefully scoped oversight. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, it will lead to racial profiling and discrimination against immigrant groups

They share concerns about profiling and discrimination, but would be less likely to oppose a registry outright if it can be designed with safeguards; they’d more often argue for strong anti-racism protections alongside transparency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

A flat rejection is unlikely: the party has emphasized protecting democratic institutions from interference, especially in the context of recent foreign-interference concerns and calls for stronger transparency measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, existing laws are sufficient to fight espionage without more bureaucracy

The Greens have generally argued Canada needs stronger, clearer accountability and transparency mechanisms around interference; saying existing laws are sufficient conflicts with that reform-oriented stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.