Sam Lilly

Very strongly agree

Yes

Pierre Poilievre has explicitly promised to withhold federal research grants from universities that do not comply with a federal free speech mandate.

Very strongly agree

Yes, taxpayers should not fund ideological echo chambers that cancel dissenting viewpoints

The party frequently rails against cancel culture and ideological bias, arguing taxpayers should not fund environments that silence dissenting viewpoints. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, universities are marketplaces of ideas where protecting offensive speech is essential to intellectual rigor

Poilievre promotes the marketplace of ideas concept, arguing that universities must be spaces where even offensive ideas can be debated without fear of censorship. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, universities must autonomously enforce conduct codes to protect marginalized students from targeted hate speech

The CPC typically views campus conduct codes and DEI initiatives as tools used to suppress legitimate, if controversial, political speech under the guise of safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

This contradicts the party's central policy of using federal funding as leverage to ensure campus free expression and institutional accountability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, using financial leverage to dictate acceptable campus speech is a dangerous authoritarian overreach

This statement characterizes the party's own policy proposal as authoritarian overreach, a framing they strongly reject in favor of protecting Charter rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.