Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Polling Division:

120 Replies

 @9ZJBV55New Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…5mos5MO

If they had done a more harmless crime, than they should be released from jail. If they had committed a crime that put another person in danger, than they should not.

 @9GZ8BL3New Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but only if they complete proper psychological evaluation and are proven to not be a danger to society.

 @9YNQFHTNew Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…5mos5MO

No, but we should increase funding to rehabilitation programs, social programs, education and skill building services to prevent non-violent crimes from occurring and continue to provide them to non-violent offenders to rehabilitate them.

 @95YJRW3New Democraticfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but they must do community service for 1-2 years everyday, or be under house arrest with a electronic braclet.

 @8YYHV6VNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but on certain conditions of rehabilitation and the type of crime must be taken into account

 @8YCQ2VPNew Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

Release from prison when rehabilitation is confirmed is important. Serving the community outside of the prison for the remainder of their sentence could also be a good alternative. That said, overcrowding is a problem that should be solved at the root. (Racism, classism, environmental factors, etc.)

 @8VRRNFFNew Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but increase funding to offer education and skill building services

 @8V3HPBLNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but they must go through education, skill building, and evaluations to be properly integrated in society. As well as completing community service.

 @8TYYJTRNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes but non-violent needs to be defined better. Certain white collar crimes do more damage to a society than a lot of drug-related offences and should be punished to balance the vicious inequity of most systems of ‘justice’.

 @8TYWNDPNew Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

Only if there is some interim program to reassimilate them back into society and they are making dome sort of restitution for their crime

 @8TQTW27New Democraticfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but they should be either placed in a rehabilitation program, or released on probation with mandatory community service depending on the situation.

 @8QXR442New Democraticfrom Newfoundland  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8QFCQGTNew Democraticfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8M2ZDKCNew Democraticfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

yes and we should increase funding to offer skill building services and education for prisoners

 @8CQLRL4New Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…5yrs5Y

I think non-violent and violent crimes should be treated differently, non-violent or dangerous crimes should result in community service

 @98SL5S5New Democraticfrom British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

I think we should have funding go towards education and skills for prisoners and invest in reform programs rather than punishment unless the crime is horrible wrong such as first degree murder

 @8ZSKRMYNew Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, and more funding should go to mental health and drug rehabilitation programs to keep more people out of prisons

 @8WNHTXHNew Democraticfrom Nova Scotia  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but they must perform community service on a daily basis and be monitored by electronic means.

 @8VPBX7TNew Democraticfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but develop more rehabilitation programs for non-violent offenders to prevent reoffending

 @8K8RJSQNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8G9WV87New Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8DSG5P5New Democraticfrom Quebec  answered…5yrs5Y

no, but make the prisons into rehabilitation centres to try and reform people with lesser crimes so that we dont need to leave them there that long and then just moniter them after their sentence

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, these prisoners should be placed on parole or probation instead and be under the supervision of a parole or probation officer for the remainder of their sentence

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes, these prisoners should be placed on parole or probation instead and be under the supervision of a parole or probation officer for the remainder of their sentence.

 @8PMZ85T from Michigan  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, and non-violent protesters shouldn't be in jail in the first place

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but place them under the supervision of a probation or parole officer for the remainder of their sentence

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, they should be placed under the supervision of a probation or parole officer for the remainder of their sentence as opposed to incarceration

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, these prisoners should be placed on probation or parole instead and under the supervision of a probation or parole officer for the remainder of their sentence.

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, these prisoners should be placed on probation or parole instead and under the supervision of a probation or parole officer for the remainder of their sentence

 @75KRFBJ from Nebraska  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8JQ9M88 from California  answered…4yrs4Y

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, these prisoners should be placed on probation or parole instead and be under the supervision of a probation or parole officer for the remainder of their sentence

 @8WCV5PP from New York  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes to an extent, those who have been convicted because of burglary and drug use should also not be released because they can be dangerous to those in their community

 @7PTCG38 from Wisconsin  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, these prisoners should be placed on probation or parole instead and be under the supervision of a probation or parole officer for the remainder of their sentence.