Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Polling Division:

120 Replies

 @B3ZF547from British Columbia  answered…3wks3W

pending on their crime. Murders, sexual predators, thieves and drug dealers should be transferred to less crowded places. But someone who accidentally killed someone (driving, etc) should perform community service.

 @95K5YQGfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

Non-violent offenses can certainly be a range of multiple different things, so I would say to tread with caution. We should definitely be putting those with mental health/psychological issues in places where they can get help, as well as those with addiction issues as well, as if we don't they just learn from other people in prisons and jail how to become a better criminal.

 @95DH7PGfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

 @94C42JLfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

Non-violent prisoners can mean a whole lot of different criminal offences, many of which aren't fit to be in the community for public safety reasons alone. I would say it's much better to direct them to where they need the most help, be that a mental hospital/ward, addiction center or therapy, but at the same time, prison still needs to be an option as some may not respond well to the help/efforts at rehabilitation.

 @93FG53Gfrom British Columbia  answered…3yrs3Y

Depends on what "non-violent offences" mean, as it is a very broad category that encompasses all kinds of offences. If they're a drug addict, they shouldn't be in jail and should be getting treatment.

 @8NS3CYQfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8JJ92DVfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, AND we should increase funding to offer educstio and skl building services

 @8FF4S5KLiberalfrom British Columbia  answered…5yrs5Y

yes if they have good behaviour and have been there for a good amount of time

 @9BK2RQ6from British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

Depends on what you mean by non-violent, but also depends on what's best for the rehabilitation of the individual, as well as the communities that they live in. Sometimes, community-based sentences are better.

 @98FPFSYLiberalfrom British Columbia  answered…2yrs2Y

Depends on what "non-violent" is classified as. If it's a crime that didn't really do a whole lot of damage, maybe that's a community service but I'm skeptical to label all "non-violent" offenses as safe to be released to the community, because that sounds like a recipe for disaster.

 @8KHYFYXfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

The whole concept of jails needs to be reformed. Let's focus on rehabilitating people and providing them with the skills and emotional capacity to re-enter society as healthy, productive individuals.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...