Try the political quiz

0 Reply

  @Daboss2o1Conservative from Alberta disagreed…7mos7MO

sure i can see banning it if the person has a history of criminal incidents, but if it's a normal person who has gone through training we should allow more weapons.

 @9G2J666from Ontario agreed…7mos7MO

I think a train indivual should have gun control but somone history with violence with weapons really shouldnt

 @9FY5RRDfrom Ontario agreed…7mos7MO

Agree. Gun restrictions should be focused on background checks and making sure you give a permit to a qualified candidate

 @9G32NHFfrom Alberta disagreed…7mos7MO

If you see a person walking down the street with a gun and you don't know if that person has gone through the proper training and you would still feel unsafe

 @9G3RGKXLiberalfrom Alberta disagreed…7mos7MO

Gun control isn’t bad in Canada right now all tho I do know is it should be more hard to buy a gin for example having a gun licence

 @9FH8KMZ from Ontario agreed…8mos8MO

we can clearly compare gun crimes in USA with gun crimes in Canada. Gun buying rules in USA is very less and it is easy to buy gun.

 @9FHJBT6 from Ontario agreed…8mos8MO

Stricter gun control laws in Canada contribute to our country being safer and the government could do even more to prevent violent crime in Canada by also funding social programs in at-risk communities.

 @9FGQ95GConservativefrom Alberta agreed…8mos8MO

So many school shootings, and any shootings. Lives are being lost and threatened almost everyday because of gun violence.

 @9FV6PWXfrom Ontario disagreed…7mos7MO

gun control only punsihes legal owners and not the illegal gun users who consist of the vast majority of crimes

 @9LTJ4D2from British Columbia disagreed…2wks2W

Canadaian life includes a lot of hunting. And hiking. Sometimes we need a gun. We also should be able to protect ourselves when the police are miles away and short staffed.

 @9LTPJYJfrom Washington agreed…2wks2W

 @9FTWLZJfrom Alberta disagreed…7mos7MO

My family loves to hunt for recreational purposes, and in very remote areas of Canada, a gun can be necessary for self defence.

 @9FVVVR5from Ontario disagreed…7mos7MO

people should be able to own guns in order to hunt for food and to protect themselves or ward off any intruders or animals. Guns should not be used against people, and they should never be used in that way.

 @9GJ23R2from Manitoba disagreed…6mos6MO

people up north and in the bush use guns to get there food, so if they put as heavy restriction on them, those people may not be able to build guns for their food, i think people that don't know how to handle a gun shouldnt be allowed to use one. i think they should do a safety course before they sell a gun to see if the person should be allowed to handle a gun

 @9H4MYZZfrom Ontario agreed…6mos6MO

There is a significant juxtaposition in gun violence statistics between countries with stricter restrictions and those with looser ones.

 @9H37S5Ffrom Ontario agreed…6mos6MO

Gun crime death rates. In 2019, Canada saw 170 and the U.S. saw 13,001. That should tell you enough.

 @9GPTQJDNew Democraticfrom Ontario agreed…6mos6MO

Guns have created issues regardless of which province one lives in. Being tighter on control and who has accesss to these can only create more saftey.

 @9FSX2DDfrom Ontario disagreed…7mos7MO

Criminals and bad people will always have access to restricted firearms, so banning hunting rifles and shotguns will only take the firearms out of the hands of the responsible owners.

 @9FRK5MRfrom Ontario agreed…7mos7MO

You can compare the gun rules of Canada to the USA. It's much easier to purchase a gun in the US which is why they have more

 @9F7M3WJfrom Ontario agreed…8mos8MO

There are a lot of resources providing data about gun shots per year. If you feel interesting, you always can go to check.

 @9H2FBNNfrom Ontario disagreed…6mos6MO

because theyre pose the same threat as a physco with a kitchen knife, except hunting is a real hobby where guns r required

 @9H24DFZfrom Ontario disagreed…6mos6MO

People kill people not guns, For example. When politicians attack guns they don’t have any acknowledgement about like the AR-15. It’s endangering people like my father who has it for self defence purposes and hunting, And before someone says you don’t need that 30 round mag to defend yourself. You do, and even if we could you can’t since there are strict magazine restrictions. Instead of attempting to ban more and more firearms, Ban mentally ill people from accessing these guns, Because at the end of the day. Banning a gun will just stop people from using and defending themselves with those guns, But a criminal wont suddenly think ‘ this gun is illegal I can’t use it ‘ before shooting up a school. They do not care, criminals Will always commit a crime because they do not care.

 @9FS8WGSfrom Ontario disagreed…7mos7MO

People who need to hunt and survive on the wild game that they shoot and eat need guns. Guns are not made to shoot people and should not ever be used that way.

 @9FFM5Y5from Ontario agreed…8mos8MO

Mass shootings happen in numerous countries, however, they usually tend to happen in countries with less gun control laws, causing higher levels of gun owners due to the fact the gun control laws are so out of control. The Gun Violence Archive recorded over 600 mass shootings in the United States in 2020. Also, the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime reports that the global average intentional homicide rate in 2019 was about 6.1 per 100,000 population. With more gun control laws, these numbers would most likely drop drastically.

 @9FDKCN3from British Columbia agreed…8mos8MO

The reason they should because if you think about the shootings that happen it not all of them are mentally ill or criminals. For example school shooting or shooting in general it mostly because of arguments or something like that.

 @9FH39G5from Ontario disagreed…8mos8MO

If legal gun owners cannot have their guns anymore than when they are in a dangerous situation (eg. shooter, assault etc) they are defenceless and more people will get hurt because bad people will still buy or steal guns illegally.

 @9FVFZJTConservativefrom Alberta disagreed…7mos7MO

more crimanals get there guns from smuggled guns from the states than gun stores and we should have the right to bear arms.

 @9M25595from Ontario disagreed…5 days5D

i think that its the people that kill people not the gun as the gun is a machine it does not think or know what its doing its just functioning its the peoples fault that people are dying everyday to shootings

 @9M22DWCConservativefrom Alberta disagreed…5 days5D

The amount of gun violence due to purchasing guns properly in Canada is very low. The reason for most gun violence is through illegal purchasing of guns, more should be done about the illegal people instead of the people who want to buy a gun to hunt or keep theyre home safe.

 @9LXTXBNfrom Alberta disagreed…1wk1W

People who want to get guns to hurt people will find a way to get guns regardless of government regulation

 @9LX8Q6Dfrom Alberta disagreed…1wk1W

Self carry for anyone without any criminal record should be allowed safety to all our citizens and children

 @9LVCFCFfrom Alberta disagreed…1wk1W

If I really wanted a gun for nefarious purposes I would find a way to get a gun. Super strict regulations only affect law abiding citizens.

 @9LTS8SGfrom Ontario agreed…2wks2W

Gun violence remains a significant public health and safety issue globally, with devastating consequences for individuals, families, and communities. In the United States, for example, firearms are a leading cause of death, with over 38,000 gun-related fatalities reported in 2019 alone. This includes homicides, suicides, and unintentional shootings. Stricter gun control measures, such as universal background checks, restrictions on high-capacity magazines, and red flag laws, have been shown to correlate with lower rates of gun violence and fatalities. By implementing sensible gun control policies, we can help prevent tragedies, save lives, and p

 @9LTKHJ5from Ontario disagreed…2wks2W

sure i can see banning it if the person has a history of criminal incidents, but if it's a normal person who has gone through training we should allow more weapons.

 @9LSLZ24from Ontario disagreed…2wks2W

Crime control not gun control. Gun control has historically allowed governments to abuse and enslave their populations.

 @9LR75H2from Saskatchewan disagreed…2wks2W

Criminals don’t care about gun laws if we have more tighter gun control laws then the law abiding people would have less resources to defend themselves with, the criminals don’t care about gun laws because they are criminals, we should have less control in gun laws and let more good people be armed and protect their families.

 @9LQMKD9from Ontario disagreed…2wks2W

Just like it isn`t the pencil's fault the student failed the test, it isn`t the gun`s fault it shot someone.

 @9LQFYB7from Georgia agreed…2wks2W

just last year nearly 350 school shootings occurred in the US alone. maybe some of these were inevitable but many could have been prevented. Canada has a lot fewer cases in comparison and i hope it stays that way.

 @9LQBT4Yfrom Alberta disagreed…2wks2W

gun control only affects law-abiding citizens and efforts should be focused on laws that would target criminals

 @9LP28BLfrom Quebec disagreed…2wks2W

Gun laws are more than tight enough, and getting worse. the legal gun owners are not the problem, it’s the criminals with guns that are the problem. If you commit a violent crime with a gun you should be sentenced to life in prison. Real life not this 25years Canadian law calls life.

 @9L2NKB8People’sfrom Ontario agreed…2mos2MO

If you have to walk in fear of dying to someone with a gun that’s shows why guns shouldn’t be allowed.

 @9KW36W5Liberalfrom Ontario agreed…2mos2MO

Stricter gun control measures, supported by data and public opinion, have been shown to reduce gun violence, prevent mass shootings, and protect public safety without infringing on the rights of responsible gun owners. International comparisons highlight the effectiveness of such measures in countries with comprehensive firearm regulations.

 @9JY922Sfrom British Columbia disagreed…3mos3MO

Guns don’t kill people. People kill people. As long as we have the right people getting guns then there is no problem. Banning guns will only make a black market making it easier for people who shouldn’t have guns to get them

 @9JXF34Zfrom Ontario agreed…3mos3MO

Each day 12 children die from gun violence in America. Another 32 are shot and injured.

Guns are the leading cause of death among American children and teens. 1 out of 10 gun deaths are age 19 or younger

in 2022, 34 students and adults died while more than 43,000 children were exposed to gunfire at school

 @9HXQKT4from Ontario disagreed…4mos4MO

That people can be safe, but it's need to be regulated, with a rule that say that you can hurt just in case that you are in really danger, and if you use your gun must be in a part no mortal.

 @9H2RJ6Zfrom New York disagreed…6mos6MO

We have had guns for a long time, the recent skyrocketing in violent incidents isn't a gun issue, but aental health issue, societal issue. We should focus on why it's happening

 @9H2QR8Sfrom British Columbia disagreed…6mos6MO

People should be allowed to purchase weapons to defend themselves and their property, along with going hunting.

 @9H243W9Liberalfrom Ontario agreed…6mos6MO

There should be restrictions because nobody who isn’t in need of gun should have one and no one with malicious intent should be able to just buy one

 @9GVK6XLfrom Alberta agreed…6mos6MO

It could help our country in being safer and we won't have to worry about if children will be safe when going to school.

 @9GTQ229from Ontario disagreed…6mos6MO

Gun control hurts proper gun knees more. People that commit crimes with them can obtain them illegally. Also, certain types of guns aren’t more dangerous than others

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this answer.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...