Try the political quiz
+

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Reply

 @9FTFDYYGreenfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

The government should subsidize those who were originally able to afford a home on their salary, but may lose it to circumstances evidently out of control.

 @95HK34HConservativefrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

The government should subsidize housing developments to help companies offset their costs and lower the price of the houses

 @94N3SN7from Prince Edward Island  answered…3yrs3Y

 @93RB687from Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

The government in addition to doing this should lower the cost of housing in order to avoid spending so much on helping others.

 @92864H2from Manitoba  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8VVZV8Jfrom Quebec  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but they should educate people on managing finances better and provide homes with fairer pricing (condos, appartements) for people with lower incomes.

 @8VRZY3Vfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

This should be a case by case basis and yes the government should be taxing corporations that own housing heavily in order to subsidize public housing, however individuals or families that own 2-5 properties in order to generate an income should not be treated the same as multinational corporations buying up apartment blocs.

 @8VHDXZXfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Should deal with supply issues instead of pushing demand for starter homes

 @8VDNCS7New Democraticfrom Northwest Territories  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8V8T75Mfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

No, but the government should ensure that affordable residences for rent exist for people unable to purchase homes

 @8V67R5Dfrom New Brunswick  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8V5QQBQNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Should be allowed less of a downpayment. Or given interest free loan for downpayment if they have a good credit history.

 @8TW4RDKfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

No, they should just properly regulate the housing industry such that prices don't inflate faster than currency inflation.

 @8THC23Vfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8T7FGL6from Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8T4MX9Wfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

Maybe only under 40 or 30k, 120k is an awful lot per year and enough to live more than comfortably.

 @8T4CBN2from Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes but can’t be enough that they live off it because it will not promote working for their money or achieving their goals.

 @8RGTCB6from Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

They should provide a head start to for first time home buyers to get into the market but I don't think they should be given a full grant every time.

 @8PPWC7Nfrom Nova Scotia  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8PLK7TKfrom Alberta  answered…4yrs4Y

 @8NSJNJ6from Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

they should help people that need a home and who are living homeless and in shelters instead.

 @8NBJKHQfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

The Government should subsidize homebuyers who make less then 50k per year.

 @98QLV4Yfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

 @97QYQ2VCommunistfrom Ontario  answered…2yrs2Y

The government should build social housing units for everyone, so that we have affordable housing for all.

 @8YLS2NNNew Democraticfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

 @8YB8J6Nfrom Ontario  answered…3yrs3Y

Foreign ownership and land speculating must be severely limited and new, environmentally designed houses/communities should be built to create new stock