@ISIDEWITHQuestionsHealthcareStarted 9yrs agoActive 9hrs ago

Should the federal government increase spending on healthcare?

+
Expand
+ Settings x  Conservative

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 94.9k Conservative voters.

54%
Yes
46%
No
51%
Yes
35%
No
2%
Yes, and do not privatize any services
8%
No, and implement a two tier public/private system
4%
No, and more services should be privatized

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 94.9k Conservative voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 94.9k Conservative voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Conservative voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @4R4XY7Nfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Increase with direction towards more natural medicine/treatment to promote safety and reason.

 @B2XHDKFfrom Alberta  answered…3wks3W

Only in needed ways, and ways that would help the people in healthcare that work hard and long hours for their money, for the good of everyone.

 @9MFQG58from Saskatchewan  answered…10mos10MO

No healthcare should be free for everyone because people are really poor these days and can barely afford to live

 @B3HTCDYfrom British Columbia  answered…4 days4D

Yes but they need to look at re-structuring management and nurses shifts. Nurses should work as teams so there is a cohesive team at all times. Re-structure processes in emergency as well

 @B3H825Kfrom Ontario  answered…5 days5D

If the spending is increased, I'd like to know where it is going to. That way we could see if it's going to waste or not. I don't really have a stance on this because I am not educated enough on this topic.

 @B3G3R7Sfrom Ontario  answered…6 days6D

Yes add spending by adding a variety health professionals in the natural health and alternative professions to the current medical system. Promoting and working on health and wellness and alleviate the drain of chronic sickness and hospitalizations.

 @B3G2PTYfrom Quebec  answered…6 days6D

Ensure Canadian citizens are cared for primarily. Our own citizens can’t get a doctor but all the influx of immigrants are given priority. This has weighed heavily on our heath care and we can’t keep up

 @B3DFHZGfrom Ontario  answered…1wk1W

No, the government should manage the substantial funds better. It is not a matter of money but of mismanagement.

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…7mos7MO

Trump Accuses Biden Harris Campaign of "Money Laundering"

The Trump campaign filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) on Tuesday accusing President Biden and VP Kamala Harris of violating campaign finance laws with the transfer of $91 million in fundraising cash to her new campaign.According to the complaint, Harris is "seeking to perpetrate a $91.5 million dollar heist of Joe Biden’s leftover campaign cash."Trump campaign general counsel David Warrington called the act a "brazen money grab that would constitute the single largest excessive contribution and biggest violation in the history of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended," adding "Kamala Harris is in the process of committing the largest campaign finance violation in American history and she is using the Commission’s own forms to do it.""The Commission must not and cannot sit idly by while one candidate takes nearly one hundred million dollars from the authorized committee of another, in violation of the Act and the will of the donors who gave the money in the first place."The complaint names Biden, Harris, "Biden for President (aka Harris for President) and Keana Spencer, as treasurer, for flagrantly violating the Act by making and receiving an excessive contribution of nearly one hundred million dollars, and for filing fraudulent forms with the Commission purporting to repurpose one candidate’s principal campaign committee for the use of another candidate."

▲  1513 replies

Active 1wk ago

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…4mos4MO

Trump's Deportation Storm: America Braces for Mass Exodus of Immigrants

For months, immigration advocates have been planning for the possibility of Donald Trump’s return to the White House. Now, their worst fears have arrived.Immigrants’ rights groups have spent the last year preparing for a second Trump term and an overhaul of the nation’s immigration system, analyzing Trump’s proposals, drafting legal briefs, coordinating messaging and organizing aid for immigrants and asylum seekers. They responded to Trump’s victory with alarm and vowed to put up a fight, setting the stage for four more years of contentious court battles with his administration.Some are already preparing to push current leadership at the Department of Homeland Security to take steps to stymie the incoming Trump team, particularly on immigrant detention and the use of AI in enforcement.“We should expect to see the devastation of immigrant communities all over the country. We should expect to see family separation,” said Kica Matos, the president of the National Immigration Law Center. “It is entirely possible that he will try to use the military to carry out deportations, so that means that Americans all over the country will see the military engaging in enforcement against civilian populations, which is horrifying.”Trump, after winning a historic victory on a platform of turbo-charged immigration enforcement, has said he will conduct mass deportations at a scale never before seen. Immigrant advocates have warned this would be expensive and inhumane, separating families and wrecking communities. The president-elect has also vowed to build huge detention camps, hire thousands more border agents, funnel military spending toward border security and invoke the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to expel suspected members of drug cartels and criminal gangs without court hearings.He has also said he would end “catch-and-release” — allowing migrants to remain free, often with monitoring, while they await immigration court hearings — and restore a policy from his first term requiring asylum seekers to remain in Mexico while their cases are processed. And he has dodged questions about whether he would try to bring back family separation.

▲  4333 replies