Statistics are shown for this demographic
Response rates from 2.3k Non-Interventionism voters.
62% Yes |
32% No |
46% Yes |
27% No |
7% Yes, but only when a high cost threshold is exceeded |
5% No, we cannot afford to add this at the moment |
5% Yes, but only for low income families |
|
4% Yes, cover the overall prescription costs but have the patient pay the pharmacy dispensing costs |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 2.3k Non-Interventionism voters.
Please login to unlock historical data statistics
Trend of how important this issue is for 2.3k Non-Interventionism voters.
Please login to unlock historical data statistics
Unique answers from Non-Interventionism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9F7WQT32yrs2Y
were broke becaue of tredeau
@B46NKYC4 days4D
Yes, but doctors are more strict when handing out prescriptions. So drug users aren't getting access to easy prescription drugs
@B3W9T5D2wks2W
Yes, and enact a single drug insurer as a price negotiation body and launch a drug value assessment agency
@9GPVK6G1yr1Y
yes only when it is a high cost, they require the prescription to maintain their health and they cannot afford it
@9GNXXXT1yr1Y
Have a greater discussion with the provinces and territories to discuss how it should be rolled out, and build off of that.
@9GLXDZL1yr1Y
The prescription should be paid by the people who are being prescribed or have someone in need of a prescription.
@9GHTBSS1yr1Y
Yes but No, people could also be drug addicts so I still think you should pay for your medication however if you are not eligible to afford it then it should be covered.
@9G97MP91yr1Y
Ensure that patients will not become addicted, and also ensure that doctors or pharmacists are 100% certain that they are trying to help and not just make money.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
