Statistics are shown for this demographic
Response rates from 7.3k New Westminster--Burnaby voters.
85% Yes |
11% No |
74% Yes |
9% No |
5% Yes, but only for low income families |
2% No, we cannot afford to add this at the moment |
4% Yes, but only when a high cost threshold is exceeded |
|
2% Yes, cover the overall prescription costs but have the patient pay the pharmacy dispensing costs |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 7.3k New Westminster--Burnaby voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 7.3k New Westminster--Burnaby voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from New Westminster--Burnaby voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B2BMK7B5 days5D
Yes, but allow pharmacies to choose whether or not patients pay dispensing costs, & cap them at no more than $35.
@B26DZ653wks3W
Absolutely yes, but only if equal spending is cut elsewhere and taxes aren't raised to cover it basically canceling it out.
@B23CRQ31mo1MO
No, we should only fund natural medicine. Prescription drugs have shown to be addictive and can lead to deaths from overdose.
@9GPVK6G1yr1Y
yes only when it is a high cost, they require the prescription to maintain their health and they cannot afford it
@9GNXXXT1yr1Y
Have a greater discussion with the provinces and territories to discuss how it should be rolled out, and build off of that.
@9GLXDZL1yr1Y
The prescription should be paid by the people who are being prescribed or have someone in need of a prescription.
@9GHTBSS1yr1Y
Yes but No, people could also be drug addicts so I still think you should pay for your medication however if you are not eligible to afford it then it should be covered.
@9G97MP91yr1Y
Ensure that patients will not become addicted, and also ensure that doctors or pharmacists are 100% certain that they are trying to help and not just make money.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
