Response rates from 47.2k Saskatchewan voters.
32% Yes |
68% No |
15% Yes |
66% No |
12% Yes, but only by court order |
2% No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications |
3% Yes, but only for those with criminal backgrounds |
|
2% Yes, this is necessary to combat terrorism |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 47.2k Saskatchewan voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 47.2k Saskatchewan voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Saskatchewan voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B5ZV4552 days2D
Yes, but only for the people who are under investigation with the evidence of criminal activity only for a particular case
@B5ZS6K42 days2D
no unless the person has a criminal recorded or is in reason that the police believe they could cause harm to many people
@9SXNRYK10mos10MO
Yes, so long as the country maintains a strong rule of law. As long as your right to free speech is protected, you do not need privacy in my opinion.
@9QZCYDN12mos12MO
Only if they have reasonable cause to believe somebody needs to be monitored, like if they're a criminal or there's police evidence. In addition there needs to be a court order to give permission.
@9LTNCX41yr1Y
No, unless the person is a registered offender or someone else that must be kept tabs on for safety reasons.
@9L2P5YG1yr1Y
Depends. If the person is under government radar for illegal activities, then yes. But if the person is off radar or reformed and is completely fine, even with criminal background, then should be occasionally monitored but not strictly.
@9JC6BKV1yr1Y
Yes, and all communications for any elected official should be public record before ANY private citizens are subjected to monitoring excepted by court order.
@9GNXSP72yrs2Y
No, only in cases where a warrant is needed and deemed necessary for extreme crime and terrorist activities.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
@ISIDEWITH12mos12MO
