+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 467 People’s Party voters.

80%
Yes
20%
No
68%
Yes
19%
No
7%
Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security
1%
No, but reduce their sentences
5%
Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 467 People’s Party voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 467 People’s Party voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from People’s Party voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @B46V7MRfrom Alberta  answered…1wk1W

This is a bad question. A whistleblower who does not threaten the government is no whistleblower at all, and any protection that the government might extend to them would either be performative or politically expedient. The presumption that the government would or could protect a legitimate whistleblower whose actions threatens regime power, is naive at best. Under our system where our rights are granted to us by the government, you would be a true moron to think in that circumstance an individual would be granted any rights or protections at all.

 @9VRBTLCfrom Manitoba  answered…6mos6MO

Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained, and the release of the information would not be a threat to national security.

 @8CRV6LZfrom Ontario  answered…5yrs5Y

Yes and make sure they work and are easy and effective to the whistleblower.

  @8TXVXMLfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, if they're information proves true and leads to convictions. Anyone falsely accused has rights.

 @8T25G6Cfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes but only if the information released with legally obtained and non threatening to our national security

 @8PZFYJFfrom Ontario  answered…4yrs4Y

Agree with both "Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained", and "Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security"