Statistics are shown for this demographic
Province/Territory
Electoral District (2011)
Response rates from 467 People’s Party voters.
80% Yes |
20% No |
68% Yes |
19% No |
7% Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security |
1% No, but reduce their sentences |
5% Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 467 People’s Party voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 467 People’s Party voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from People’s Party voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B46V7MR1wk1W
This is a bad question. A whistleblower who does not threaten the government is no whistleblower at all, and any protection that the government might extend to them would either be performative or politically expedient. The presumption that the government would or could protect a legitimate whistleblower whose actions threatens regime power, is naive at best. Under our system where our rights are granted to us by the government, you would be a true moron to think in that circumstance an individual would be granted any rights or protections at all.
@9VRBTLC6mos6MO
Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained, and the release of the information would not be a threat to national security.
@8P3F3JT4yrs4Y
Whistleblowers must be protected.
@8CRV6LZ5yrs5Y
Yes and make sure they work and are easy and effective to the whistleblower.
@8VQH32V4yrs4Y
@8TXVXML4yrs4Y
Yes, if they're information proves true and leads to convictions. Anyone falsely accused has rights.
@8T25G6C4yrs4Y
Yes but only if the information released with legally obtained and non threatening to our national security
@8PZFYJF4yrs4Y
Agree with both "Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained", and "Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security"
Join in on the most popular conversations.