@ISIDEWITHQuestionsenvironmentStarted 8yrs agoActive 6 days ago

Should disposable products (such as plastic cups, plates, and cutlery) that contain less than 50% of biodegradable material be banned?

In 2016, France became the first country to ban the sale of plastic disposable products that contain less than 50% of biodegradable material and in 2017, India passed a law banning all plastic disposable plastic products.

+
Expand
+ Settings x  

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 1.2k L6P voters.

62%
Yes
38%
No
58%
Yes
27%
No
4%
Yes, and ban all disposable products that are not made of at least 75% of biodegradable material
6%
No, but increase tax incentives for companies that make biodegradable products
5%
No, increase consumer incentives to recycle these products instead

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.2k L6P voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 1.2k L6P voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from L6P voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @8KQL6XNfrom British Columbia  answered…4yrs4Y

I agree to ban all disposable products that are not made of at least 75% of biodegradable material but also fix our recycling programs and GET HONEST about what Canada REALLY IS RECYCLING!! Programs for residential sorting at the curbside, THEN fines to loose individuals who don't sort properly

 @B3FD3S3from Ontario  answered…6 days6D

We should pour more money into researching ways to actually responsibly manage and recycle materials that are damaging our environment

 @B3DJY38from Ontario  answered…7 days7D

No, increase consumer incentive to recycle! But keep in mind that it's a generational cycle. It's contradictory. If you eliminate plastic products and increase paper products, the "tree huggers" complain. Benefits of disposable plastic products outweigh the destruction of our forests. It's so inconvenient to bring our own biodegradable bags, which cannot be used for anything else. Plastic garbage bags are used to line my garbage cans. I now have to buy plastic bags so I'm not really saving the environment am I? I'm now paying for plastic bags for my garbage cans and I'm paying for biodegradable bags for my purchases. It's ridiculous! It's causing more garbage not less.

 @B3DB5PQfrom Ontario  answered…7 days7D

No. Bring back plastic bags. Reusable ones are more wasteful and I'm not using less plastic bags, I'm just buying them differently

 @B3D84CLfrom Ontario  answered…7 days7D

No, let them remain but also create disposable products that are under 50%. Keep both products for efficiency but our government must be strict on the proper waste responsibility.

 @B3BG585from Ontario  answered…1wk1W

For certain things, tim hortons is still using plastic cups when they have paper straws, paper straws suck.

 @B34T6YFfrom Ontario  answered…2wks2W

Make products with 50% biodegradable materials or more the main product but encourage recycling for plastic and waste products

 @B323YJRfrom Manitoba  answered…3wks3W

Biodegradable is misleading. Compostable and recyclable materials should be encouraged with tax incentives, but phasing out of single use plastic should be done through federal regulation

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

Active 7 days ago

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…4mos4MO

Trump's Deportation Storm: America Braces for Mass Exodus of Immigrants

For months, immigration advocates have been planning for the possibility of Donald Trump’s return to the White House. Now, their worst fears have arrived.Immigrants’ rights groups have spent the last year preparing for a second Trump term and an overhaul of the nation’s immigration system, analyzing Trump’s proposals, drafting legal briefs, coordinating messaging and organizing aid for immigrants and asylum seekers. They responded to Trump’s victory with alarm and vowed to put up a fight, setting the stage for four more years of contentious court battles with his administration.Some are already preparing to push current leadership at the Department of Homeland Security to take steps to stymie the incoming Trump team, particularly on immigrant detention and the use of AI in enforcement.“We should expect to see the devastation of immigrant communities all over the country. We should expect to see family separation,” said Kica Matos, the president of the National Immigration Law Center. “It is entirely possible that he will try to use the military to carry out deportations, so that means that Americans all over the country will see the military engaging in enforcement against civilian populations, which is horrifying.”Trump, after winning a historic victory on a platform of turbo-charged immigration enforcement, has said he will conduct mass deportations at a scale never before seen. Immigrant advocates have warned this would be expensive and inhumane, separating families and wrecking communities. The president-elect has also vowed to build huge detention camps, hire thousands more border agents, funnel military spending toward border security and invoke the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to expel suspected members of drug cartels and criminal gangs without court hearings.He has also said he would end “catch-and-release” — allowing migrants to remain free, often with monitoring, while they await immigration court hearings — and restore a policy from his first term requiring asylum seekers to remain in Mexico while their cases are processed. And he has dodged questions about whether he would try to bring back family separation.

▲  4333 replies