55% Yes |
45% No |
36% Yes |
45% No |
19% Yes, but not for cosmetics |
See how support for each position on “Animal Testing” has changed over time for 24.1k Canada voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Animal Testing” has changed over time for 24.1k Canada voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Canada users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9FL248Z10mos10MO
Use animals that will cause less public opinion to conduct experiments, and prohibit the use of endangered animals and nationally protected animals.
@98N25SY2yrs2Y
Yes, but only for medical purposes such as vaccines, drug safety etc. But it should not be allowed for cosmetics. This should be allowed as long as the animals are being treated with care and not being treated as props.
@9RCRJ4F5 days5D
Definitely not for cosmetics, and not for situations where the substance places humans at little risk. All other options should be considered before animal testing, it should be an essential need for examining the action of the product or process.
@9L8JRVW4mos4MO
Yes - not for cosmetics thought - and after they've reached a certain level of testing which shows confident results that the product would not be detrimental to the health of the animals.
@9KMLH9M5mos5MO
Yes, but only for things that are necessary to our lives, like vaccines, but not anything connected to cosmetics.
@9KDYD2W5mos5MO
Use proven criminals, convicted of violent crimes, who are in prison for 10+ years (or a life sentence)
Join in on the most popular conversations.
