Green spaces in housing developments are areas designated for parks and natural landscapes to enhance residents' quality of life and environmental health. Proponents argue that it enhances community well-being and environmental quality. Opponents argue that it increases the cost of housing and developers should decide the layout of their projects.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Political party
Province/Territory
Response rates from 987 Canada voters.
79% Yes |
21% No |
79% Yes |
21% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 987 Canada voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 987 Canada voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Canada voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9RLR8YH6mos6MO
Not if it comes at the expense of solving the housing crisis
@9RC25L96mos6MO
Depends on if there is a lack of such things already or this would cause there to be a lack thereof.
@9RC2QHK6mos6MO
Yes, and be planned with accessibility to transit and public services (schools, groceries, utilities) in mind.
@9RBY87R6mos6MO
Eventually, but the primary concern should be the construction of habitats
@9RBVDVT6mos6MO
No, funds for parks and greenspaces should be captured in development fees paid to provinces and municipalities.
@9R5KN5L6mos6MO
Yes and No, there might not be enough space to include green spaces and parks
@9PZ8ZPN7mos7MO
Yes, and local government facilities should plant native hardy plants instead of current popular trends.
@9P8NRFM 7mos7MO
If possible, housing developments and communities should prevent environmental ecosystems from being too disturbed or destroyed. If this is not an option, previous ecosystems should be reintroduced elsewhere in an appropriate place where it can be insured that the ecosystem won't be too disturbed or possibly destroyed.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
