+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 357 Left voters.

11%
Yes
89%
No
11%
Yes
89%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 357 Left voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 357 Left voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Left voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9ZXWXP2from Ontario  answered…15hrs15H

No, because car aesthetics does not involve serious issues other than issues that's need more focus

 @9WYDMSDfrom British Columbia  answered…1mo1MO

no but we can give tax credits and incentives if car manufacturers did that.

 @9VCP762from Ontario  answered…2mos2MO

We should be able to design different cars, the past is in the past, if you'd like a vintage car then buy one, but that doesn't mean all cars have to be to your liking and style, everyone has different opinions and differences.

 @9SLJBJVfrom British Columbia  answered…3mos3MO

No, but things like headlights, brake lights need to remain standardized.

 @9RZPX67from Alberta  answered…4mos4MO

no it is up to private vehicle companies and the market to decide what to buy. take the tesla cybertruck, the market is currently deciding if the truck is worth the durability or not worth the cost due to aesthetics.

 @9RQNPMRfrom Nova Scotia  answered…4mos4MO

They should require function over form. Of the shelf parts bolt on bolt off modules. Fully recyclable.

 @9P8NRFM from Alberta  answered…6mos6MO

As long as the aesthetics of a vehicle does not hinder or conflict with the standards of protocols set in place to ensure the safety of the driver, its occupants, and other outside individuals within the presence of the automobile.