Answer Overview

Response rates from 9.6k Canada voters.

60%
Yes
40%
No
60%
Yes
40%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 9.6k Canada voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 9.6k Canada voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Canada voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9TZKMBHfrom Alberta answered…5 days5D

Yes and no. There should be privacy, but it could be good to have better surveilence in order to help prevent crimes.

 @9TTFZM4from Ontario answered…1wk1W

The only thing that would validate this level of "police State" would be prioritized crime.

Using this to eliminate scammers across every market would be the correct way to use this.

Using this to identify and punish people for stealing bread from corporate grocery stores is the incorrect way to use this.

Surveillance must be strictly for benevolence.

 @9PDLKNJfrom Alberta answered…3mos3MO

 @9T8FDXGfrom Alberta answered…3wks3W

No. People should instead be educated on how to protect their information themselves. as well as what to do if your information is taken.

 @9SVZPQPfrom Alberta answered…4wks4W

No, but certain websites could add a government initiated prompt that asks for the last few digits of your SIN for identification when necessary

 @9SVW64Dfrom Ontario answered…4wks4W

Yes but I’m some sense it feels like we would lose privacy and feels like a utopian controlling society which I don’t like the vibe of

 @9STLJ7Bfrom Alberta answered…4wks4W

Yes, But there should be still some anonymity as there should be some measures to protect people's identities

 @9SHGX5Qfrom Nova Scotia answered…1mo1MO

If convicted of fraud then this should lead to an automated increase in monitoring of those convicted